• jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why is it my business what is in their pants, and how they gender themselves?

    • Hexarei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      In this particular case, it’s because JP is very much vocal about both of those things. He is a cisgender male who is only objecting to the suggestion of the existence of an alternative to being the gender you were assigned at birth.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s clear from this conversation, and tweet above, the only reason to label this person as cis is to trigger them.

        That is no way to treat another human being.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolute brain-dead take.

          1. English is a gendered language, therefore it’s important to gender people for basic communication.

          2. “Cis-male/trans-male” is more inclusive than the cisnormative “male/trans-male”.

          So until everyone accepts that “male” includes cis and trans, anyone who intends to respect basic human dignity will use “Cis-male/trans-male” when discussing gender. Simple as.

          • jetA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Absolute brain-dead take.

            Now your not respecting me either, I wont talk with you anymore.