So, I saw a report from one of my users. They reported:

https://ponder.cat/post/1594852/1813842

For the reason:

Unreasonable fighting with everyone in every simple post

I think that’s ridiculous, so I talked with them about it. Posting private communications is frowned upon I guess, but long story short, they weren’t receptive. I’ve decided to ban the account.

IMO the general culture on Lemmy is that users are entitled to their free account and everyone needs to be careful and circumspect about limiting that entitlement in any way, but I don’t see it that way. I don’t think it’s a requirement for me to provide hosting space for anyone who wants to use my stuff as a jumping-off point for abuse of Lemmy’s systems, and isn’t apologetic or receptive when I talk with them about not doing that. The fact that it’s in service of harassing FlyingSquid in particular is just icing on the cake, since my perception is that people like to harass him apparently for no legitimate reason at all (with this as an example).

AITA?

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sure, in isolation thats a good moderation reason, but when you egg someone on to debate then use the ban hammer when they engage. Was their language great, no… but where they earnestly engaging with the prompt provided by moderator yes…

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, I get it. You’re not wrong. They’re just going to learn not to be forthcoming in moderator conversations in the future (which is a funny thing for me to say under this post). Also, as a more general issue, this is why I really just don’t like forbidding points of view in general.

      I’m probably way in the minority on this, but even some really offensive things, if that’s really what you think, I think you should be able to talk about it. It’s the only way people can ever work themselves out of certain types of wrong thinking, is if someone’s willing to talk with them. It doesn’t mean you have to put up with unrepentant bullshit or hatred, or let it feature in your comments section. I think that’s what Squid thought he was taking a stand against, there. But yeah I kind of agree with you on it.

      Like think of Wade Watts talking with the KKK and talking people out of racism. If someone’s being serious about what they think, and they’re open to hearing and talking about why it might be wrong, I don’t think it does anyone any favors to say “No you are bad get out now.” They’re just going to learn to carefully not raise certain subjects, and never have their mind changed about any of it. Or else, they’re going to decide you’re the enemy now, and talk to other people who think like them, and attack you when they do interact with you.

      Again there are certain lines you have to draw. I’m not saying “free speech.” I’m just saying that honest debate means you have to let some people in with wrong opinions. Like I say, I actually agree with certain parts of what kemsat said factually. I think he just used some trigger-words,and trigger-words have this unfortunate outsized importance right now.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Agreed.

        I think the banned user was using freak when they meant abnormal, but freak does mean abnormal in the dictionary. They even contextualized it by saying all athletes are abnormal by dint of being athletes.

        So someone asking for a debate wont give the person they requested a response from the benefit of the doubt and engage with their meaning and not their exact vocabulary (which is still correct, if a little triggering - as you said)

        For a third party moderator to jump in and say thats not allowed vocabulary, fine. For someone who asked for the debate to do it, thats constructive abuse and arguing in bad faith.

        Anyway, this was a old moderation decision, its not the point of this current post. I think i’ve illustrated why this user/moderator is so polarizing to many people - which was the inquiry in the actual post here :)

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, fair enough. And getting hung up on which specific words are being used, and saying that certain words make you a bad person when if you’d said the exact same thing while carefully using other words, it would have been fine, leading to extensive discussions about which are the allowed words and not, is a popular but poisonous pastime.