• jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They do kind of suck. But from a city planner perspective you already have the right of way for all that road. Makes sense to put the transit station in the middle of the right of way.

    Maybe add airport style moving walkways for the highway transit centers to increase the catchment area. Imagine if you could go 500 m on a moving walkway from transit stop away from the highway into the urban area

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They also don’t have to entirely be terrible places to be.

      Just look at Amsterdam-Zuid Station as an example of how to make such a highway median station bearable.
      Though it is worth noting that Amsterdam-Zuid will be redeveloped in the coming years to move the highways underground

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Elevated parkland above the highways seems very nice. Just expensive

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why stop there? Why not build a hospital suspended in the most human-hostile area of land in the entire fucking city? A library? A day care? All that wasted land!

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Name checks out