InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agoDems consider this a "take down".hexbear.netimagemessage-square34linkfedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1125arrow-down1imageDems consider this a "take down".hexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square34linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoWe should do landback and call it Golfo de las Américas if that’s what we’re going for.
minus-squareblame [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agowhy is giving it a spanish name landback
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agoI mean do landback and then rename stuff. Renaming stuff before landback is just liberal premature emancipation.
minus-squareOldSoulHippie [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 months agoI’d back that. Why not? I really wonder if the next lib president is going to change it back or not. They never “fix” stuff the Republicans do so I would be surprised. I could see them spinning it like I mentioned above just out of sheer laziness
We should do landback and call it Golfo de las Américas if that’s what we’re going for.
why is giving it a spanish name landback
I mean do landback and then rename stuff. Renaming stuff before landback is just liberal premature emancipation.
I’d back that. Why not?
I really wonder if the next lib president is going to change it back or not. They never “fix” stuff the Republicans do so I would be surprised. I could see them spinning it like I mentioned above just out of sheer laziness