I wouldn’t consider voting for any of these people in the general election, but I recognize that people often live in gerrymandered districts, and therefore vote in Republican primaries in order to have some influence over their local representatives. For people living in such a district, choosing a least-bad candidate is a way try and moderate the Republican party just a bit.

Candidates are listed by poll-based estimates of their support, which makes it rather clear that Republicans as a whole have sought to reject any kind of meaningful path to zero greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Trump: His actions as president may have caused irreversible damage to the global climate.

  • DeSantis: He has supported efforts to adapt to the effects of climate change, but not to prevent it.

  • Scott: He acknowledges climate change but rejects most efforts to stop it.

  • Ramaswamy: He opposes all government efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

  • Haley: She supports carbon-capture technology but has denounced efforts to reduce emissions.)

  • Pence: He claims climate change is exaggerated and would prioritize domestic energy production.

  • Christie: He supports action on climate change with some caveats.

  • Hutchinson: He denounces government mandates but supports private renewable energy development.

  • Burgum: He has supported carbon-capture as governor, but what he would do as president is unclear.

  • Hurd: He acknowledges that climate change is a major threat, but what he would do is unclear.

  • Suarez: He has pursued significant emission reductions in Miami.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 年前

    Baffling that some still either choose to ignore the problem or outright oppose any efforts to mitigate it. Climate change shouldn’t be a political issue. It will be an existential issue.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      I wouldn’t really call it baffling: the Republican party operates as a patronage machine, with people who made their money extracting fossil fuels being key patrons.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      Largely anecdotal but my experience is the people I know that were soundly in the “climate change isn’t real and it’s just a hoax” camp are now pretty much all in the “okay it’s probably real but just a natural thing that happens to the earth. Happened before and will happen again. It has nothing to do with us.” So it makes sense that a person with that mindset would ignore the problem or even acknowledge it straight on but refuse to actually do anything about it.

      Still baffling tho…

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        “Alright fine, my house is burning down around me, but it wasn’t arson, it’s just an electrical fire! I’m just gonna hang out on the sofa and watch Fox.”

  • elephantgrenades@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    They’re all assholes. The United States is the one country that can lead climate reformation on a global scale and they’re worried about dicking their opponents. My children deserve better.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 年前

    Carbon capture is a scam.

    Either say “pollute what you want into the atmosphere but then you are responsible for carbon capture to remove it” or get fucked.

    Carbon tax is the best solution.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Carbon capture is supposed to capture carbon before it’s released into the atmosphere.

      But yeah, it’s a scam, because it’s real easy for polluters to say they’re capturing without actually capturing.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      It would certainly work, but hasn’t had the support to get through Congress. So the Democrats passed an almost-all-carrots approach in the Inflation Reduction Act

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        It’s scientifically and physically possible but it’s not economically possible.

        Throwing money into a hole isn’t going to make it the solution. We need to fund it because it is a need solution for the future. But at them moment we are far better fixing other problems.

        Basically we got a hole in the ship and water is pouring in. Some oil CEO fuckwit wants to design a pump to get the water out and tells everyone that letting water in isn’t a bad thing. In fact it’s a good thing because if we ignore it we have more resources to go towards this pump.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          About 1% of Inflation Reduction Act goes to removal like that. Most of it is spent on decarbonization of electric generation and electrification of homes