Meh, it’s science-y enough for me. They didn’t say anything factually wrong in the article. And when they say stuff like, “Scientist says object may be extraterrestrial…” or shit like that. The scientist does say that, as in they haven’t ruled it out. The article mentions that it’s probably just natural radio-noise from celestial events.
Clickbait headlines on articles is way different than saying that they actually make up everything.
Meh, it’s me. It’s not like anyone visits or takes this comm seriously!
The very fact that my name is attached to it means it lost credibility, regardless of content. I could put peer-reviewed articles created by the best minds in science, and it’d still get downvoted. LMAO
Meh, it’s science-y enough for me. They didn’t say anything factually wrong in the article. And when they say stuff like, “Scientist says object may be extraterrestrial…” or shit like that. The scientist does say that, as in they haven’t ruled it out. The article mentions that it’s probably just natural radio-noise from celestial events.
Clickbait headlines on articles is way different than saying that they actually make up everything.
fair enough, best of luck with the community.
Meh, it’s me. It’s not like anyone visits or takes this comm seriously!
The very fact that my name is attached to it means it lost credibility, regardless of content. I could put peer-reviewed articles created by the best minds in science, and it’d still get downvoted. LMAO
I’m perfectly fine with that :)