You must log in or # to comment.
Been watching some Bob’s Burgers recently, and there are some weird ones in there. It actually seems to have some wildly different standards for acceptability across episodes.
I groan a lot rewatching old shows, or don’t find the jokes funny anymore in 2026, but I think people forget that society progresses.
Take the Seinfeld episode where a reporter thinks George and Jerry are partners and they freak out about it but say “not that theres anything wrong with that.” The joke isn’t them being called gay but their immature reaction.
A lot of younger modern viewers don’t like it, and I get it. The scenes do play on a lot of stereotypes but they fail to realize in the mid 90s homosexuality was almost never mentioned on tv and when it was its was a slur. Just the act of making an episode that featured a discussion on homosexuality and didn’t use it as an insult ever was progress. Yes by todays standards a lot of the sterotypical behavior George and Jerry present throughout the episode is in poor taste but it wasn’t made with todays standards.
I’m surprised how many people seem offended by this comic. I found it pretty relatable. That doesn’t mean I “don’t understand context”, or think the writers were bad people, or that the shows aren’t worth watching. It just means I find it personally unpleasant to find these jokes in a work I’m otherwise enjoying.
When kids study older literature and media in school, generally when there’s a slur or racist reference or joke, the teacher will stop and explain the context and get the kids to reflect on it and why it’s probably not acceptable today. Even though I understand this and know it going in, I’m still kind of doing an abridged version of that in my head when something like this comes up in a show – I’ve been following along, laughing with the writers, and then suddenly I’m backing up and distancing myself from one joke or idea. It’s jarring, it pulls me out of the show, and it’s just not fun.
In some cases it also comes across as incredibly lazy and unoriginal. So many sitcoms from that era have “the trans episode”, “the gay episode”, “the lecherous character” – and they all make the same unfunny jokes, and it’s a reminder than a lot of these shows, even in their time, were just not that creative. Plenty of modern shows have the same problem, but they don’t draw attention to it by having large classes of “stock jokes” that simply do not land today.
When kids study older literature and media in school, generally when there’s a slur or racist reference or joke, the teacher will stop and explain the context and get the kids to reflect on it and why it’s probably not acceptable today.
I still remember how my English teacher gave context on usage of the n-word in Huckleberry Finn and how insightful it was for us at that age.
Comicstrips has oddly enough the most reactionary community out of anywhere on Lemmy that I’ve discovered. Often full of the worst takes from commentors outraged at decency.
The one that still gets me, and mostly because in this day and age of 2026 it still doesn’t get as much homophobic backlash as I feel it clearly deserves is the pejorative: cocksucker.
In my anecdotal experience, 99.55% of the time, it’s leveraged against men and used as a homophobic slur.
But even so, is sucking cock really that terrible of a thing to do? The vast majority of people with a cock enjoy the service. We literally celebrate the people who do it well for us personally, in most cases.
Why is it used as a slur?
Anyway, I’m off to suck some cock, see ya’ll later.
Safe travels, cocksucker!
(Mods, please don’t ban me. Please observe the context. Oh my god please jesus don’t do it)
That was pretty funny…safe travels indeed.
99.55%
The specificity of this made me imagine that you had actually taken inventory of every single time you’ve encountered this in your personal life experience and done the math, lol.
George Carlin (who is idolized and rightly so, mostly) had a line in one of his standup specials where he said “you show me a tropical fruit and I’ll show you a cocksucker from Guatemala”. Homophobia was just so normalized back then (this was the ‘80s). Eddie Murphy had a whole routine (which he has since apologized for, to his credit) imagining Mr. T as a homosexual ("Hey boy you lookin’ mighty cute in them jeans!"). Robin Williams (also idolized here) routinely acted gay for the humor value of it (such as it was).
George Carlin (who is idolized and rightly so, mostly) had a line in one of his standup specials where he said “you show me a tropical fruit and I’ll show you a cocksucker from Guatemala”. Homophobia was just so normalized back then (this was the ‘80s).
I don’t think this bit was homophobic at all, and that you’ve misinterpreted it, through omission and otherwise. If anything, homophobia is part of what is being laughed at (and a small piece of the overall joke). I’ll explain.
To begin with, you left out key parts of the joke; he wasn’t expressing that as himself. Here’s the full bit:
I remember something my third grade teacher used to say. She used to say “You show me a tropical fruit, and I’ll show you a cocksucker from Guatemala.” No, wait… that wasn’t her. That was a guy I met in the Army.
While the joke uses “fruit” as slang for gay as part of it, that isn’t actually even the punchline, the wordplay is just a vehicle for it. The humor primarily hinges on the notion of a grade school teacher saying something that crass (the second part specifically) to a child, coupled with the implication that it was something she said more than once (“used to say” instead of “said”).
Then he realizes it was some grunt who was in the Army with him (who it’d make more sense to say something crass/uncouth like that), which adds another element of humor in ‘how could he possibly mix those two people up?’. If anything, that hypothetical Army guy is being laughed at in part for the homophobic slur usage.
Yep! And that’s part of the culture I grew up in and came to age in. Media that demonized and mocked gay men (and really all gay people), even otherwise progressive and lighthearted media.
It was damaging to me as a child. More so than a lot of people could ever realize.
Also disheartening is that a lot of my super religious family will use the term cocksucker as a derogatory statement right in front of me, knowing I’m gay. These are the same exact people who literally freak out and act like you’ve shot their mother in front of them if you say the word “fuck” or “god damn”.
Cocksucker is just a good word to say; in my language the word for Cancer (yes we curse with that) is used in the same way and is also very controversial.
It usually implies that whoever is giving head is being take advantage of.
i.e. They got swindled by some shitty male into pleasing said male at the cost of their own dignity.
It doesn’t happen always, but it happens often enough for the act to be seen as degrading.
I took it to mean that the person referred to is an opportunist of sorts. A man who will perform said act on another man for some kind of benefit, despite being straight or disliking that man.
There goes my hero, watch him as he goes.
I’m interested in the viewpoints of gay men on this. I’m happy to retire the term (I don’t even know if I’ve ever actually used it), but it would be good to know if folks are actually getting offended by it.
In modern times I take it to be derogatory in an “involuntary submissive” context. One who sucks cock not because they want to, but because they are in some situation where they must.
A mouth is a mouth so you might be onto something
Motherfucker - Includes (Most) dads of 2 or more kids.
Why two or more?
Do you think people with only one child no longer have sex?
The first time she’s not yet a mother
I’m not excluding them.
It’s that I can’t prove that a 1 child father is a Motherfucker.
2 kids from the same mother? Someone is a Motherfucker.
Hello, 1 child motherfucker here, and I appreciate your reasoning!
Although, since my mind can’t help but wander into the what-ifs and edge cases, I bet there is some tiny number of pairings of people who have 2+ biological children together and yet never had sex.
Oh yes. A whole lot of edge cases. Surrogate mothers, step-dads, lesbian and gay parents etc. Lots of people to offend with an off the cuff joke.
I chose to focus on the motherfucking obvious.
Why is it used as a slur?
Easiest way to push their buttons. One may not care if another sucks cock, but if they’re insecure like these folks, then it is very effective.
Growing up, the worst thing you could be was a guy who liked other dudes. Being called a fag and cocksucker was just like “casual” insults, the way Australians call someone a cunt.
I kind of like when it’s reclaimed. Like someone calling themselves a fag or a whore.
Because usually the bully ends up getting even more mad.
The vast majority of people with a cock enjoy the service.
And likely figured out they aren’t as flexible as they’d like.
interestingly, it’s less about flexibility and more about ‘strength.’ There was a how-to guide a while ago that emphasized the method of ‘hands behind thighs’ to pull oneself to that point. Leverage and body mechanics make it pretty difficult, and flexibility isn’t even half of the battle.
While the issue you bring up is legit…what sitcom ever used that word? I feel like that would only ever be in an R rated movie
All over Deadwood.
But being called a Cocksucker by a wild West brothel owner may be historically accurate.
Sopranos is pretty funny I guess
But it’s the wrong hole! >:V
Early 2000s entertainment too. A good portion of the edgy jokes could be considered funny because they were made on the assumption that “We can laugh about this, because we all know racism and sexism is bad, right?”.
And then 2015ish happened and it became obvious that a lot of people weren’t laughing AT the -isms but rather WITH.
EDIT: Which slur did Ross use, BTW? I haven’t watched that show in eons, and I don’t remember any.
Round of applause to Deep Space 9 for holding up after all these years, half that station was bi at the very least.
The alternate universe on that show was the horniest thing in TV for decades.
Horniest? I mean, DS9 did run concurrently with Lexx…
Never heard of this before. Google tells me it was only available in the US on Showtime and later the SciFi channel, neither of which I had access to.
it’s on YouTube for free
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZVMGCh7sZUjUiCdLnH2koZbTpTM5wp9m
Season 2 is peak Lexx
It’s one of my favorite tv shows.
Fyi all these videos in this playlist are deleted as of 22 of Feb at 2p est…
It was even licensed and translated for broadcast in other countries, but I concur that Lexx is a bit obscure one
Lexx was a British-German-Canadian production.
Lexx is a British-Canadian-German production.
I see you never watched Farscape and its BDSM space muppets.
There is absolutely no inaccuracy in that description of that frelling show.
It doesn’t matter who you are, Evil Kira wants you lol
Season 1 Bashir probably needed an HR meeting abput his continued sexual advances on Jadzia.
Don’t worry, Garak was working on fixing him.
Thats why we have Garak
Oh, the Occupation apologist? He was still justifying the concentration camps into season 5.
Yeah, and eventually he came around. He was never supposed to be perfect, but he grew, and that made him interesting.
haven’t seen friends but as someone familiar with the zeitgeist it’s almost certainly “retarded”
which was also all over adult swim at the time and is recently having its renaissance
Ah, the infamous hard R
I havent watched LTT content in a while but I was watching that stream and Lukes face when Linus says that will live forever rent free in my head.
I’ve noticed that lately. It went from being everywhere to nowhere and now it’s creeping back up. I’ll be honest here, I miss the word but if it’s hurting that many people who haven’t done anything then you’re a fucking piece of shit if you use it.
I was rooting for the “gay” renaissance where people talked about how gay everything was but changed it to mean awesome instead of shitty.
That would be pretty gay
Yeah that this is just how millennials talked in high school and we’re entering into that “old person stops caring” phase of life about now?
We’re not that old yet ffs.
There are none of us in our 20s anymore.
Last time I checked old didn’t cover 30s+ even 50+ is still middle aged.
Who’ve you checked with? Boomers or Zoomers?
I was rooting for the “gay” renaissance where people talked about how gay everything was but changed it to mean awesome instead of shitty.
wait you too?
Absolutely. I’m still rooting for it but it seems to be kind of petering out here.
Thats the same reason I hate Trailer Park Boys.
So much of it is laughing at the poors. I know people who are so sheltered and middleclass they think “LoL can you imagine if people lived like this”
Bruh, you ever known people born into generatiknal poverty?
Bruh, you ever known people born into generatiknal poverty?
You mean like the cast and writers of the show?
I think you have what I mean twisted. What life is like for people stuck in the poverty or trailer park cycle is not a universal experience and for all the people that do get it or do empathise and have an understanding that “this is a window into a world I’m not from presented in a humorous way” theres someone sitting there laughing thinking that the whole thing is a wild exaggeration, laughing at the idea that people are really like that or using it to confirm their own biases “the parts that confirm my biases are facts and the parts that dont are just entertainment”
Me hating the show isnt a commentary on its quality, the creators and cast should be very proud of it. I just cant stand to sit and watch it because some of it is too real to be funny as someone who also came up really fucking poor.
Mibber
I…I fear the purity bot. Please don’t take my face.
Can’t speak to sitcoms, but I’m watching ER (1994) and it gave two excellent examples
In season one, where it was more prestigious and Michael Crichton was more directly involved, there’s an episode where a trans women comes in and the doctors are uncomfortable treating her - which eventually leads to the patient’s suicide. The moral being that even this person who is strange deserves compassion from us.
In season three, where it has become more of a formulaic tv drama, there’s an episode where a trans woman comes in and it’s played entirely for laughs, including the trans woman insisting that she gets bad PMS when on her period.
I’m gonna say something bold:
Surprisingly not a problem for some shows, good example is Simpson golden age.
There is a gay episode but it’s mostly about Homer overreacting.
A lot of the satire of Simpson is trying to be functional in a dysfunctional system, which has aged like the greatest wine that frank grimes can’t afford.
I watched Cheers a while back and was surprised at how well it’d aged. Sitcoms are a second-monitor show for me, so it’s possible I missed something, but overall no episodes gave me the Ick too badly.
I think a lot of the time it’s Gen Z not understanding context. There was overt racism, but a lot of media that is considered racist now was either depicting the experience of people at the time or making fun of racists.
Blazing Saddles. Took me a bit to understand this when I was younger. When I first saw it, I thought it was simply outdated humor. Then I thought it was edgy. Then I finally grasped that the whole joke is actually directed at racist white folks and that their racism just makes them look really stupid.
The quintessential example. Rocky Horror is another.
I’d also include the controversy around “Baby It’s Cold Outside”.
I’d also include the controversy around “Baby It’s Cold Outside”.
The irony is that in fully understanding the song and the culture of the time it was written in, the song is literally the opposite of what the outrage junkies made of it. They think it’s a song about a guy keeping a woman at his place against her will (the notion that he actually drugged her drink (and in such a way that she could tell by tasting it) is especially hilarious) through subtle intimidation, and that rape is apparently imminent.
But in fact, it’s a very empowering (especially for its time, ~80 years ago) song about a woman who defies social/cultural norms/rules to do what she wants and go ahead and spend the night at this guy’s place:
- All of her ‘protests’ have to do with her reputation specifically, she talks about how she “should”/“must”/“ought to” leave, but never once says “I want to leave”
- “What’s in this drink” was a blame-shifting/plausible deniability tactic, not too different from how people blame their actions on alcohol even today. Although the song is very progressive, she doesn’t completely abandon the social rules, so she adds this bit as an ‘excuse’ for the fact that she is absolutely and willfully spending the night with this guy. For the same reason, she ‘can’t’ simply straight-up ‘say yes’ to him; it’d be unladylike to accept such an offer, after all. So she does the stuff in the first bullet point instead.
P.S. Also, the original songwriter wrote the song specifically for him and his wife to perform together for friends at a housewarming party. It wasn’t even considered to be released commercially until it became a huge hit at parties that they were invited to specifically to perform it. The idea that it’s a predatory date rape song is extra ridiculous with that context, aside from everything else.
Yes, that’s all true.
But its no different from the other examples I gave. All three of those are empowering art that modern listeners take out of context and get offended by.
If I stay people will think we had sex!
OMG! He’s pressuring her into sex!
The song has a line where the girl asks what’s in her drink. You can interpret that however you want.
You can interpret that however you want.
Not if you want to be accurate:
“Hey what’s in this drink” was a stock joke at the time, and the punchline was invariably that there’s actually pretty much nothing in the drink, not even a significant amount of alcohol.
See, this woman is staying late, unchaperoned, at a dude’s house. In the 1940’s, that’s the kind of thing Good Girls aren’t supposed to do — and she wants people to think she’s a good girl. The woman in the song says outright, multiple times, that what other people will think of her staying is what she’s really concerned about: “the neighbors might think,” “my maiden aunt’s mind is vicious,” “there’s bound to be talk tomorrow.” But she’s having a really good time, and she wants to stay, and so she is excusing her uncharacteristically bold behavior (either to the guy or to herself) by blaming it on the drink — unaware that the drink is actually really weak, maybe not even alcoholic at all. That’s the joke. That is the standard joke that’s going on when a woman in media from the early-to-mid 20th century says “hey, what’s in this drink?” It is not a joke about how she’s drunk and about to be raped. It’s a joke about how she’s perfectly sober and about to have awesome consensual sex and use the drink for plausible deniability because she’s living in a society where women aren’t supposed to have sexual agency.
I’m not debating that at all. I’m merely pointing out that we live in a post-Cosby society.
She knows exactly what’s in the drink.
The context is that she doesn’t want to leave.
Now multiply that misunderstanding by 1 billion.
I’d say that’s mostly true for comedy. But some of the earlier stuff was definitely like “point and laugh at this race”. Like the original looney tunes and stuff had some that were rough. They got better about it later but those early episodes had a few that were a little…close lol
But that wasn’t in the '90s. The last thing I can actually think of as an example of point-and-laugh at a race was Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961). In the '80s there was Dukes of Hazzard, but it wasn’t overtly racist, they just only had black people as bad guys in the deep South. As a kid that went right over my head.
I think most examples in the '90s would be stereotyping races but not making fun of them. Overtly. Kind of like the token Asian or the token black guy to fill out a group of friends. I guess I want more examples to be given because when you’re younger a lot of that stuff goes of your head compared to when you’re older.
they just only had black people as bad guys in the deep South
Boss Hogg and Cletus were white villains.
Sorry my statement wasn’t that the only villains were black people, but rather that when black people were on the show they were always villains.
I’ll take your word on that.
Separate but related. I just looked at the cast from the 80s. There is a distinct lack of black actors in general.
Oh yea some of it was definitely just overt racism.
Yeah, if you find an overly racist character then the joke is probably directed at them being racist.
It’s amazing how many people are offended by Uncle Ruckus. Like, way more than are offended by Uncle Remus, incredibly enough.
The Boondocks just isn’t a show for the emasculated generation.
It wouldn’t have gotten made if they were in charge.
Id be careful blaming the newer generation. That’s what those snowflake boomers did, saying shit like, “Oh those millennials… We can’t even make a joke anymore” because their jokes suck ass, those little bitches.
Well Gen Z is quite young. Children understand trigger-words more, subtle context less so.
The very youngest of gen z is 15 right now, and the majority is adults
I’m only just beginning to understand what L.P Hartley meant when he said “The past is a foreign country”
Ageism on Lemmy, impossible.
As the other commenter has said, the youngest gen z aren’t children anymore - they’re teens.
We can put King of the Hill in that camp as well I think.
I think it’s a better and more rounded show than any of them.
It’s a bit awkward, because Kahn was Toby Huss doing a problematic accent, but is also generally praised for representation of SEA culture.
Oh yeah, I love that one! It makes fun of everybody! In good taste too. XD
Sorry Mr. Burns, but I don’t go in for these backdoor shenanigans. Sure, I’m flattered - maybe even a little curious… but the answer is no!
It was the best of times; it was the ~ B L U R S T ~ O F ~ T I M E S ~
The Simpsons was pretty progressive though
Most people don’t recognize how the Simpsons was satire.
Yeah, GrandWolf319 was commending the show. :)
Apu has entered the chat.
Apu is tough because I know at least a dozen people just like him who own their own store and are somehow behind the counter every single time I walk in.
I heard Frank Grimes didn’t even go to space
How thin the skin? I’ve noticed stuff like that my whole life. You can’t pretend it all away. No matter how much you want it to not exist it will. It moves and changes but the inherent human tendency to take a dig at someone or something you don’t like will always be with us. Its the slurs you use personally without thought that you should worry about. Don’t think you have never done it.
I wish I could get people to care about health care and wages as much as they care about mean words. So many seemingly don’t mind being robbed blind as long as our ruling parties using the correct terminology.
Pretty sure you’ve described neoliberalism in a nutshell.
As Talleyrand once said: “An important art of politicians is to find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the public.”
What, and give up purity testing? That would eliminate 90% of our recreational outrage and give us time and energy to actually do something. Can’t have that.
Without my sexual identity and virtue signaling I wouldn’t have any personality at all.
What’s funny is it’s literally a shared behavior across the entire political spectrum in America but each side pretends it’s only the other side doing it.
White American liberals in a nutshell
You make a good point. I don’t give them enough credit for their performative politics.
God, this is cringe. Like, it’s embarrassing to be on the same team as them.
It’s because we aren’t on the same team
That’s also the conclusion I’ve reached.
Yeah, yeah.
I know, right?
Why are democrats so proud to be the lesser evil? Why can’t we just be the good guys?
It’s the consultancy class, mostly. Corporate money.
Being the lesser evil means never taking action. Never taking action means nothing difficult for Amazon ever happens.
Did they all just do a superhero landing? That shit is hard on the knees.
I thought they were Teebowing
Honestly a little impressed they were all able to kneel and get back up at all.
The same people who care more about mean words than reducing the disparity in the wealth are the ones profiting off of the disparity in wealth.
Everyone loves money, including gays, blacks, and women.
Those topics are simple and easy to understand.
Understanding the long arc of the oppression of the labor class and the systemic design failures of US Healthcare is hard and the explanation won’t fit in a TikTok.
Yeah, all the word policing kinda feels like a psyop because it’s stirring up a lot of conflict without any real benefit. Controlling what words are ok doesn’t make people respect the ones hurt by the words, and ultimately it’s the disrespect that causes the hurt, the words are just the manifestation of that.
Like with disabled people, pretty much every word used to describe them has become an insult and any new word will just suffer the same fate pretty much the same day it gets popularized.
But the argument itself is polarizing, though in a way that makes the other side shut up about it until they can find like minded people. And might end up joining MAGA because they think it’s about trolling people policing language and words like “woke” end up having very different meanings to the different groups (one side sees it as a respect for all regardless of background or capabilities, the other sees it as a drive for censorship) to the point where people supporting the other side seem “evil”, which then means that as MAGAs wake up and see it is about more than just policing words, their opponents are more likely to tell them to fuck off than.
And that’s not even mentioning the people who take the stance “my racism/sexism is ok because it’s against the race/gender with more power”, and the people who treat non-malicious acknowledgement of differences between genders/races/cultures the same as malicious ones and no fucking wonder there’s strong opposition.
Were the “mean words” ever used against you?
Yes. Now get over it.
Bzzzt. Rhetoric.
Do they still call this thread-jacking?
Don’t be the vegan at the party, dude.
Nah, this is why it’s important to make sure “vegans” are at your parties.
I feel like every time I tried watching Big Bang Theory, I got this vibe.
“haha that guy is such a fucking nerd!” was virtually every laugh-track riddled joke.
You’re just not the target audience, as shown in this handy diagram:
I think Breaking Bad belongs in the middle one with Futurama because I don’t think it required intelligence to be entertained.
My first watch through was purely a “watch Hal do some crazy shit” where the action entertained and everything else was just an annoyance. I just didn’t care about the moral implications or whatever message the show was trying to make, I was happy watching an “outsider enters dangerous world he knows little about and fucks shit up”.
Second watch through I stopped seeing him as Hal and disliked him before the end of the first episode. If anything, he was more like Malcolm (book smart but otherwise dumb and entitled).
Though maybe that’s more just about BB being entertaining even if you aren’t the target audience.
Well god dammit I don’t know where I fall.
Hey that’s not fair to BBT, half of those jokes were “Sheldon is neurodiverse”
No! Stop! He’s not! - The showrunner for some reason
Because if you acknowledge that he’s autistic, then a LOT of the series becomes “laugh at a nasty charicature of a disabled person.”
That’s how the representation should be handled.
This guy is awkward but has all these friends, they laugh and sometimes don’t understand him but they’re still friends.
If the show could be that progressive about neurodivergence then it might actually be good.
He said hello hahahahhahahaa…hahahahahaha omg omg bro omg he said- he said hahaha he said HELLO hahahaha
I read your comment with a laugh track!
I will always defend BBT as 6 seasons of a great show dragged out and dumbed down for prime time. I think if someone went through it and discarded the filler jokes, arcs that go nowhere and excessive laugh track it could have been really good.
My wife likes the show as background noise and I’ve studied it. Theres some real relationship writing and some genuinely good character growth, some of the non “Ha! Nerds!” Jokes are actually pretty funny.
90’s
'90s
#weDoNotPluraliseWithApostrophes
but it belongs to the 90s! 👀
So it should be 90s’.
9’0s
,06
'90’s’thn’t
That’s like, your opinion, man. It’s not a universally agreed-on rule.
New York Times Manual of Style and Usage (1999):
decades should usually be given in numerals: the 1990’s; the mid-1970’s; the 90’s. But when a decade begins a sentence it must be spelled out.
The Chicago Manual of Style (2003):
9.37 Decades. Decades are either spelled out (as long as the century is clear) and lowercased or expressed in numerals. No apostrophe appears between the year and the s.
Same goes for initialisms, e.g. CDs vs CD’s.
EDIT: to be clear, I prefer no apostrophe too, I just didn’t like the unnecessary condescension. One thing worse than a grammar nazi is a wrong grammar nazi.
The CD’s (singular) tracks and the CDs’ (plural) tracks. Or would it be CD’s’? That’s my one gripe with putting the apostrophe s for acronyms.
But then when talking about someone getting “all As” in school, it’s easy there to realize what’s being said, but when someone asks “What grades did you get in school?” And you respond “As,” now it’s just the word as.
Grammarizing spoken word is a major part of my job and I think about this shit all the time, and sometimes things conflict, and it’s dumb, it’s all dumb! That’s it!
But then when talking about someone getting “all As” in school, it’s easy there to realize what’s being said
Some would think that there is supposed to be a ’ in there but no, the additional “s” is simply missing.
I read your comment a few times before I understood it. Thank you
deleted by creator
Posting this here because this is the most recent instance: every time I see deleted by creator on Lemmy, my first thought is always “damn, God REALLY did not like that comment.”
I thought Tyler the Creator had better shit to do than this.
I have collected so many of the movies I remember fondly as a Gen X’er. From the ‘70s to the ‘90s. Holy shit the stuff I’d forgotten that was in them. Rape-y stuff, comments about underage girls and basically leering at them with tbe camera, suicides, misogyny, women as sexual objects and nothing else, racism… It’s bad. I’d started a movie or two with my kids and had a “oh no” moment when a part started that I’d completely forgotten about. Some of that still exists, but it’s there as a narrative and plot point about the character doing the shitty things rather than the casual and institutional way it was played before. Just goes to show you how times and people (can; some don’t) change. Some of that stuff was not unusual in life for me back then, I wouldn’t dream of it today.
watching “scary movie” in 2025 makes you appreciate how much society has progressed in the past 25 years
Yeah I was pretty sure the key master/gatekeeper stuff would go over my kids’ heads but I forgot about the ghost-sex scene.
Ironically, other stuff with a high rating is actually due to blood/gore but the other content is pretty low-key. I’d rather they watch Terminator than a lot of the “funny” stuff
What we consider funny has shifted quite a bit, at least publicly and for decent people. There are still plenty who are perfectly fine with lowbrow racism and all that as far as what constitutes humor.
Check out “Fiend Without A Face 1958”. You’ll thank me. I don’t care about the precise context of this reply.
This is an important point.
But what if the racism etc makes the joke. And it’s a funny joke.That makes it ok. Because humor trumps that other stuff.
Only in very, very limited context. A minority can make fun of their own group all they want, and an “outsider” can do so but can’t really be punching down and it can’t be making someone less because of their ethnicity. Painting outside those lines is risky at the very least.
Well there is satirical stuff like Blazing Saddles where the racism is kinda core to the film, but it’s being mocked rather than promoted.
Ditto the original Lethal Weapon in regards to the main villain. The “Playground scene” from JoyRide also kinda alludes to racism but subverts expectations in a fun way
I had a similar reaction to seeing brown face in Ben Hur (1959). The character itself was a positive depiction, so there’s that I guess. It could have easily ruined the whole movie.
I had a hardcover book sitting on my shelf. Got it at a yard sale a while back. “The 13 Crimes of Science Fiction,” it was published in 1979 and most of the stories are much older.
The level of racism was pretty amazing. One story referred to a mugger as a ‘black buck’ Another was set centuries in the future and had an anthropologist keeping some ‘primitive’ people in high tech chains and cages.
Agatha Christie is probably one of the most popular writers of the 20th Century, and one of her classics is now published under the title “And Then, There Were None.”
If you’ve ever seen a movie, play, or game where a group of people are invited to a house only to be killed off one by one, you’ve seen something influenced by “And Then, There Were None”.
Generally the victims are symbolized by figurines on the mantelpiece which get gradually destroyed one by one as the murders progress, eventually leaving “none”.
The previously published title was the incredibly culturally insensitive “Ten Little Indians”, and the figurines were just that.
The original published title, in the UK, in 1939 - an era when we DID IN FACT KNOW BETTER was “Ten Little removeds”.
They did not change the title in the UK until 1985(!)
Is quoting Wikipedia now banned on Lemmy? I was under impression arsehole censoring mods here were mostly focused on removing mentions of Israeli genocide of Palestinians.
“Ten Little removeds”.
so for anyone else confused…
“Content not viewable in your region”?
Now I’m more confused.
There you go. This censorship is getting ridiculous. Next time people born in Fucking, Austria won’t be able to explain where they are from.
Chuds not being able to post the N word for a day — challenge level: impossible.
Like, we all knew what the book was, but it was still SO important for you to post this. It was life or death for you. Not saying slurs physically makes your skin crawl. You cannot help but be a racist sack of shit.
I would personally send you to the gulag.
As an Australian who has never studied Agatha Christie in any context, I literally had no clue what the censored word was. I was, and am, appreciative of the context that was provided by other commenters. Be careful when you make blanket statements like “we all knew what the book was”, because you’ll almost always be confidently incorrect.
10 little subsets of the the human species with really high level of melanin in their skin.
the screenshot is hosted on imgur.com, do you generally have problems with that one? it was just a screenshot of mentioned wiki article.
Got you. Imgur is now completely blocked in the UK after the “Online Safety Act”, “to protect the children”, because maybe one of the pictures hosted on it is some boobs or something?
I had no idea. Time to search for replacement.
It’s automated. Instances can setup a list of words that will automatically get removed. Has nothing to do where it comes from.
Also, jordanlund is a mod himself, so…
jordanlund is a mod himself
I know 😁
Bots will automatically remove certain words regardless of context.
I used to see this all the time in the old Sega game “Phantasy Star Online” where objectionable chat was replaced with “*”.
So “Nice shoes!” became “Nice s****!”
You couldn’t arrange to play a game on “Sa****ay”.
And god help you if you lived in a “ba*****t”.
Or if your name was Nasser…
Same problem but when I migrated from Black Ops 1 to Modern Warfare 2 or something similar - couldn’t name my class containing assault rifles “assault”
deleted by creator
Dark Souls would do something similar with names in PvP. For the most part it wasn’t a huge deal but being a medieval fantasy game, a lot of players you’d face would be called “___ K***ht”.
I really thought you were talking about Elder scrolls, and was wondering how Khajiit would be censored (“haji”?) before my dyslexia kicked out
I still can’t figure it out.
knight
k***ht
Because it doesn’t make sense, DS and ER are overly censoring, my friend made a character, bowperson, it censors it to bo***rson
Black Knight? Great film
I wanted to make a lore friendly character name in elden ring but they censored the word finger…
Variations on the way we used to handle the Scunthorp problems are almost always amusing for how bad they were
I love how your experience with regex censoring comes down to Phantasy Star Online. It’s so on the money for you to use as a reference.
Truly king of the neckbeards.
Lemmy admins can create word filters. They replace words with removed when you use a word in the filter.
Most admins only add slurs and other nasty things. In this case we’re talking about the N word, hard R.
Worth noting that the original n-word version is the title was taken from a popular song at the time the book was published.
I point this out to demonstrate that this book title wasn’t a weird cultural aberration, it was plugging directly into popular culture of its era.
That book was translated to Finnish in 1940 with name “eikä yksikään pelastunut” (and no one survived), and it was renamed to literal translation to the ten little nwords in 1968!!! Until in 2003 they changed it back to the original
It’s even worse in French: I read it in the early 2000s in high school and the title was “10 petits n*gres”. It seems they only changed it in 2020 😬
In Hungarian, it’s still “Tíz kicsi néger”, though “néger” does not carry the same connotation in the language, if anything, it’s archaic.
You can be a mainstream politician and say it on live TV, and people will at most laugh at the old person.
Our version of the n-word is spelled the same.
What’s wrong with the last one? Seems like a pretty standard critique of “science” as evil destroying humanity. In Brave New World they had reservations for the savages who still had religious beliefs, and it was a touristic attraction.
I present Exhibit A.
