• HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars fulfill a very self-indulgent narrative. ‘I get to decide where and when I travel’, makes people feel “free” snd “important” even when millions of them are silently coming to the same decisions-- like going downtown at 09:00 on weekdsys-- that allow huge efficiency plays.

    Notice how many ads feature fantasies of open roads and trips to faraway attractions, not the real world of “I need to sit in rush hour traffic from 6:30 on to get to the Work Factory”

    Maybe public transit needs to focus its message on the freedom from drudgery it offers-- you don’t have to be staring at the driver in front of you, scanning the traffic reports

  • psud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because many of us live in places where you must use a car, there are no alternatives

    In such places electric public transport is nothing but a pipe dream

  • BodePlotHole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dunno what country you are from, but here in the US of A, the monopolies that own all the train infrastructure make sure to keep trains as public transportation as cost prohibitive as possible.

  • dnick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because trains aren’t economically viable for the vast majority of the US, and where they are economically they are the topic of conversation.

    As far as why the conversation would center around the US, that’s just the regular American-centric tilt english conversations generally lean towards. Most of Europe has their shit together in some topics like this (public transportation, for instance) and the US is a huge consumer of automobiles and no one if building mass transit between the middle of nowhere to the other middle of nowhere where we could ‘efficiently’ move individually insignificant numbers of people at a time.

  • OrbitalHorizon@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Public transportation in America is typically a magnet for crime.

    I’ll take a hard pass on being trapped in a tube with my assailants.

  • Carter@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not every journey is possible with public transport. People will still need to lug equipment about in the electric future.

    • spiphy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah what is going on? Seems like every other comment is full on car-brain-cars-are-freedom insanity. No enough orange pilled people here. Is the opposite of the orange pill the sad grey pill?

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Always hated that argument for big cars. You buy a new bed/mattress/big furniture like once a year. Delivery is maybe 50 bucks. The extra cost of a car big enough to transport that stuff is in the thousands. Somehow everyone gets upset when confronted with delivery fees while being perfectly fine with dishing out cash for a car. Redo the fucking math.

      • Bye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s a bit of an oversimplification of the argument

        I use my car to transport my bike, surfboard, skis, dog, lawnmower, buy furniture, buy lumber etc for projects, and more. It just can’t be beat in terms of convenience. For repairs around the house, gardening, etc, it’s a must-have.

        A 1998 CR-V does all that and it cost me $2500. Bomb-proof b20b also, I love it. I don’t think you can beat that in terms of convenience.

        I’m all for trains and buses (electric busses would be great!) but the utility wanes when lots of people bring stuff. I used to have a 45 minute bus commute, and the bus had racks for bikes. I’d bring my bike to do the 5 mile trip to and from bus stops at both ends. But lots of people wanted to do that, and you’d have to be early in line to get your bike on the bus, otherwise you had to wait for the next one. I can’t imagine people trying to bring 2x4s or potted plants on the bus! Or their pets, another issue altogether.

        • arbitrary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’ll buy an electric car for some 20k+ once that car breaks down to haul your frequent furniture and lumber purchases?

          Because the discussion isn’t about ‘I have a car and won’t exchange it for a train’ but ‘moving transportation onto trains instead of electric cars would be a lot more beneficial as the future of transportation’

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funnily Ive got downvoted for bringing the same argument against replaceable phone batteries in another thread. Like, just pay a tech once every few years to do it for you.

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did, on a trolley bus. Blocked an entire exit, but we timed it just right as to get on a mostly empty one and not inconvinience lot of people

    • torpak@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      cars are stuck to roads and much less efficient everywhere many people need to go. cars are basically useful where only few people live or work.

    • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And trains aren’t stuck to roads. And planes aren’t stuck to roads. And ships aren’t stuck to roads.

  • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they give people a lot more freedom than trains — if you own a car. If you don’t own a car but live in a society where everybody else has one you are kinda screwed.

    • whatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know it is not necessarily your opinion, but cars don’t give freedom to people - even if you own one. You pay so much for your car, the society pays a lot for the infrastructure, this infrastructure takes away the freedom from people (especially children) to live and move outside, when you drive you can (should) do nothing else, it’s reputation as individual way of transport blocks expansion of public transit, … every aspect of a car is taking freedom away from you. A car that gives people freedom is a marketing strategy and the opposite is true.

  • Crucible_Fodder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but no train takes me from my front door to my job/the movies/my vacation place. And my car works even if the state decides to shut down the trains/buses.

    • constnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if the state decides to shut down oil supply? Or the electric grid? That logic applies to cars as much as trains. Those all rely on government oversite, even when privately owned.

      We decry the government, claiming it’s inept. We listen to and vote in people who say the government is inept. Then when those we just voted in do a horrible job we then point at the mess and say, “see the government doesn’t work”. It’s a self fulfilling prophecy.