Nato members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance’s 32 members said they had “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine’s military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest.”

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    As an American I think that would all be reasonable…if the official US position was that Mexico has no right to exist, the Mexican people should be forcibly integrated into our society as 2nd class citizens, and the US Army was in the process of a “peacekeeping operation” in Mexico to carry all this out.

    For all our flaws, we respect the borders of our neighbors and don’t have irridentist aspirations that belong in the 19th century. Russia is the aggressor here, and they have demonstrated that they have little interest in global peace or human rights, only increasing their sphere of influence.

    Continually rolling over for thugs because it’s what avoids nuclear conflict will only lead to a global order based on thuggery, and it likely won’t even avoid nuclear conflict in the end.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I kinda wish the US, Mexico, and Canada were more unified though. I know we are cool, ish, but the American Union (Canadians super love it when you call them North Americans) or something less USA sounding would be kinda great.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Call it the North American Trade Union and try to get some of the Central Americans in on it. Also invite Greenland into it just to make that situation where Denmark is part of the EU but greenland isnt more confusing.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      109
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m no fan of Russia … I’m just stating my opinion because I don’t want to die in a nuclear holocaust because everyone didn’t want to see reason.

      There’s only one country in modern history that has spread global influence and threats in every part of the world, imposed, threatened, created and caused violence everywhere for decades while imposing their financial, political and economic powers on everyone everywhere for all of modern history …

      … and it isn’t the Russians.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ah, There it is, the thing that you ultimately wanted to say but tried to be coy about.

        “America bad”

        And here I thought the topic at hand was Ukraine becoming a NATO member, not AmErIcAn ImPeRiAliSm

        • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          45
          ·
          4 months ago

          NATO is an arm of American imperialism so it’s relevant to the article and conversation at hand.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            So if the US gets out of Nato like Trump promised, what then? It magically disolves because there are no sovereign countries in there? Or is it still an arm of american imperialism and all ze eviilz in the world?

            • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              4 months ago

              It would definitely weaken a ton although I doubt it would immediately dissolve, although its power is heavily based on our leadership and military and anyone who doesn’t see that is pretty naive. Hopefully Europe would help Ukraine enough to make up for us having Trump and probably not helping them anymore, though.

                • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  23
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It wasn’t a good question nor was it asked in good faith. I answered what I could with some context. It’s like asking if we know the world would have no wars after we got rid of the Nazis and all the evil in the world would disappear. Well, no, obviously not, but that it doesn’t mean it wouldn’t improve things.

                  • Maalus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    19
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    It was a regular question that doesn’t fit within your narrow view of “US bad everybody evil because puppets of US”

              • Freefall@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                Probably not helping them? You mean against a trump US joining the Russians. The dude really wants us on the evil side of WW3.

                • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  He could remove aid but I doubt he could convince Congress and the American people to help Russia. Plus, his whole pro-Russia thing with respect to the war has been posed as an isolation thing. Maybe I’m wrong, though. He’s not afraid to be a hypocrite. A Trump candidacy is depressing and I’ve been trying not to dwell on the possibility of it tbh.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          56
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          America bad is literally the reason why countries don’t want NATO on their border. You don’t get to ignore that key point and pretend OP was arguing in bad faith.

          America invades countries to overthrow their government steal their natural resources. Lybia, Afghanistan, Iraq, even the Genocide in Gaza is made possible by NATO countries doing the weapons logistics.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            And yet Russia has multiple borders with NATO countries. “Your opinion” is parroting kremlin propaganda about “the nuclear end” that “will totally happen you guys” and can be summarized by “let’s give Russia everything they want, because they have nukes so they can now rule everyone”

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              33
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I really don’t care enough about Russia to defend their actions any further but if you look on a map you see Ukraine does not just encircle Russia but actually sticks inwards quite a bit.

              And Russia did start getting more imperialist the closer NATO came.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ah yes the closer NATO came, since before they had east Germany, Poland and other countries.

                Dude. Think about what you are saying or read up more. You are repeating russian propaganda and nothing else. This is a land grab invasion. NATO doesn’t have shit to do with it otherwise Russia wouldn’t grab all their troops on NATO borders and move them to Ukraine. They know NATO isn’t an offensive alliance and are using that, then telling people like you bullshit about NATO encroachment, novorossia or other idiotic ramblings.

                  • Maalus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    23
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Dude, you aren’t some barely interested dude that “doesn’t care about Russia”. People have memories and can remember your posts you know. This isn’t new for you spreading pro-Russia bullshit, you do it all the time and get downvoted to hell for it. Stop hiding behind “oh I don’t really care, buuuuut”, you aren’t fooling me.

                  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    20
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    “I don’t care about russia”, but spends 10 comments in a row defending Russia and saying “um ackshyually nato made them do it 🤓☝️”

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Sorry, but as Eastern European, we begged for NATO membership because of constant (>200 years) Russian occupation hazard. We only care about America as a strong ally (of many) in the NATO group, there is no imperialism, direct, indirect, effective or otherwise interprettable. It’s a purely defensive pact with all its tenets clearly and publicly laid out.

            We could not fight back alone and we wouldnt be able to, because just as to Ukraine and as to Nazis, the amount of meat Russia (yes the whole country, not just Putin) is willing to throw into the meatgrinder is incomprehensible.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              4 months ago

              Also, these sorts don’t seem to realize that NATO is on Russia’s border regardless of Ukraine’s status. Even before Russia invaded and Finland joined NATO.

              They’ve never looked at a fucking map.

              • nyctre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I mean… When they’re claiming russia applied to NATO and was rejected… What did you expect, a sound and reasonable mind? They’re literally just repeating their propaganda, nothing more.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh I know, but I’ve heard that particular lie about Russia not wanting NATO on their border being behind the invasion way too many times. NATO has literally been bordering Russia since its inception.

                  • nyctre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Yeah, fair. That’s the easiest, most obvious piece of propaganda to debunk ever. And they swallow it like it’s putin’s cum. Oh well… I hope they at least enjoy the taste.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              44
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Russia might still have invaded without NATO provocation. However while Russia is evil, they do have a very valid point in not wanting NATO next to their border.

              Especially since Russia’s NATO application got rejected.

              • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                28
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ukraine not joining NATO

                Russia invade Ukraine

                NATO now very open to Ukraine joining due to a Russian threat.

                See how Russia is causing the NATO membership? Not preventing it.

                To me it feels like Russia saying they’re invading due to NATO is just a smokescreen for something else, and a way to get support from their population.

                And as it’s caused the NATO membership, Russians can now say “see! We told you so! They are joining just like we said!”, ignoring that they’ve directly caused this outcome.

                I wonder if the main reason for this is just to try and better secure the black sea for some reason.

                • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Russia didn’t just cause NATO membership for Ukraine, they’re the reason NATO was formed in the first place.

                  People should learn about WWII and the roots of these problems. Spend some time with the atrocities coming out of the USSR as they butchered and raped their way through peaceful countries in Europe.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  25
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/2/pdf/220214-factsheet_NATO-Ukraine_Relations_.pdf

                  June 2017, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted legislation reinstating membership in NATO as a strategic foreign and security policy objective. In 2019, a corresponding amendment to Ukraine’s Constitution entered into force.

                  In September 2020, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy approved Ukraine’s new National Security Strategy, which provides for the development of the distinctive partnership with NATO with the aim of membership in NATO

                  Also relevant is Zelensky staging a coup in Ukraine in 2014 to overthrow the Russian puppet regime that was in place at that time. Meaning Russia lost control over Ukraine politically.

                  • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    14
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Right. And if I say that I’m changing my diet to fit with my neighbours, that doesn’t make me part of neighbour’s family.

                    I get what you’re saying, they were aligning themselves to become NATO members. That’s not the same as what’s happening now though where NATO are saying “yes we want them in”, which is an outcome Russia has caused by this invasion.

                    Edit- just another note…both of these occurred since Russia annexed Crimea, which could definitely be construed as aggressive behaviour on Russia’s part. Again pointing towards Russia causing an outcome they’re claiming to have a problem with.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            America bad is literally the reason why countries don’t want NATO on their border

            Well, so far the only country really throwing a shit fit about having NATO on their border is Russia, probably because NATO membership gets in the way of his neo-USSR expansion plans. Don’t use a plural where it doesn’t belong.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I recall Afghanistan having a NATO problem within their borders. And Lybia. And Iraq. And many other countries.

              Despite all the marketing NATO is not a defensive alliance. It is an offensive one in actions.

              • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                I also recall Afghanistan having a Russia problem inside their borders. A very large Russia problem that Russia lost. Also NATO didnt even start that, the US did, and was the primary driver of all Afghanistan actions, and then drug some part of NATO into it (which is a separate problem) after the fact. Your point?

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  And you forgot about the NATO problem very convenient. Doesn’t fit your narrative.

                  • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    The US Afganistan invasion was supplied through Pakistan, and to a lesser extent, the old Russian lines that Russia used in its own invasion. Georgia was also an intermediary to a lesser degree.

                    None of these are NATO members.

          • Miaou@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            What? None of that would have been different without NATO. Iraq did not even involve NATO at all

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Oof https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_88247.htm

              The participation in the invasion was also NATO participants. Same with the Genocide in Gaza right now where NATO countries are doing the military logistics to provide israel with bombs and tank shells to blow up Palestinian kids.

              Either directly or indirectly NATO is just an extension of whatever imperialist escapades we go on. And the few times people actually need it it’s utterly worthless such as Srebrenica and NATO just lets a Genocide happen without doing anything.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                You can have independent operations by members states. If a couple of my cousins and myself go and murder someone that doesnt mean it was done by my clan. It just means some people in my clan are murderers, most alliance networks allow independent operations and actions seperate from the alliance.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The NATO site is literally bragging about it.

                  And yeah it just so happen people in the NATO allience all just keep invading countries together under false pretenses and lies of national security.

                  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    One experience is experience youre gonna brag about having it. Two most of the alliance didnt participate, the only members who did were the US, Uk, and Poland for some reason. Thats only two of the founding memebers and three members total, Australia was also there. It was a massive operation done by pretty important nations Poland is the most important NATO member in the east of Europe, the US just is the most important member, and Britain is also pretty fucken important.

                    But all four of the countries involved have independent alliances with eachother seperate from NATO, yes their offensive capabilities are helped by NATO but that is only on the experience and equipment level. If NATO was actually directly involved id expect France and Germany to have been involved for example.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, the Russians totally didn’t force other countries to adopt their economic system and extract their resources for their own gain.

        Totally didn’t happen anywhere, especially not in Eastern Europe.

        /s

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          Me as a Romanian: heh. Yup, no post WW2 puppet government extracted our resources, no sirree bob. Totally benevolent soviet occupational forces who bestowed flowers, kisses and rainbows upon the populace.

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Same old script. “Ohh NATO forced us!!” “Aren’t you scared of nukes!?!?” “What about America!!?”

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m just stating my opinion because I don’t want to die in a nuclear holocaust because everyone didn’t want to see reason.

        So you are willing to sacrifice Ukraine and its people so you can appeace a dictator for a short while and sleep soundly safe in your bed thousands of miles away … How noble your opinion is