NO MORE ADS
odysee.com
View NO MORE ADS on Odysee

Odysee, a decentralised YouTube alternative focused on free speech, is officially ending the serving of ads on the platform, starting today. The post:

"Dear friends of Odysee, Starting today, we’re removing all ads. We don’t need ads to make money as a platform and we are confident in the development of our own new monetisation programs that will help creators earn a living and at the same time keep Odysee alive. Ultimately, sacrificing the overall user experience to make a few bucks isn’t worth it to us and nor is it even sustainable for a platform that wishes to make something truly open and creatively free.

As we take this decision, one thing is certain to us, media platforms (even ones that market themselves as ‘free-speech’) typically devolve into advertising companies and end up becoming beholden to their paymasters. It’s been that way for centuries and is never going to change.

As we see YouTube become more aggressive with their ad deployment and ‘Free Speech’ platforms try to build their own ad businesses it’s apparent to us that we’re building a model for Odysee that will keep it sustainable not only financially, but in its ability to provide an incorruptible user experience.

Our approach may be considered niche or unconventional, that’s fine by us. Odysee will be used by the world on terms that are agreeable to its users, and we know our users don’t like ads.

Best, Founder & Creator, Chief Executive Officer. Julian Chandra"

  • jetAEnglish
    41·
    5 months ago

    From your definition if you speak and there exists one human who cannot hear you (asleep, in a different place, or deaf) then you have no free speech because you didn’t have total distribution.

    My definition is if a group of people want to talk about the space pope nobody can stop them from doing so amongst themselves.

    I acknowledge we have different definitions, and i appreciate the discussion we have had, thank you for helping me see your viewpoint.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      5 months ago

      It’s not a binary choice, and that’s disingenuous to make it one.

      Your second paragraph is not relevant because it excludes dissenting opinion that may not want to hear about the space pope. The anti-space pope league admin is not in the group of people you posit.

      Thank you for the discussion.

      E: ivxferre does a better job making the distinction than I do.

      https://mander.xyz/comment/12562291

      • jetAEnglish
        11·
        5 months ago

        At the core of the human experience two people can talk about anything, all these machines and networks need to enable that same experience.

        If three people get together and two want to talk about the space pope and one doesn’t because they are part of the anti-space pope league, the third person can change the topic, argue with the other two, or leave the group.

        If later 10 people come together in a group and half are pro-space pope and half are anti-space pope and they don’t always have to talk about the space-pope. If people in the anti-space pope group decide to stop coming to the gathering because they don’t want to talk space-pope anymore… this is normal behavior, and computers and networks should enable this behavior pattern.

        As far as I can tell lemmy enabled all of this behavior patterns.