How the hell did the character get so viral? I’ve tried watching the skits several times to see if maybe I’m missing something, but for the life of me, I can’t seem to see it. Is everyone just biased because it’s Tom Hanks? Or is it actually hilarious, and I’m just struggling to understand the humor? Fall/Spooky season is my absolute favorite time of year, but am I just a buzz kill?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The skit is absurd, the pacing works well, and everyone involved is clearly having fun as there are multiple close calls on breaking character. It is funny because of how it doesn’t make sense, a couple of characters are also aware of it not making sense, and then they get runaround answers when they try to figure it out.

    No comedy bit lands for everyone though.

    • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I know it doesn’t. I just genuinely don’t find it funny. I do appreciate the breakdown though, makes sense why people aside from me would like it.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      This was the perfect explanation. Thank you.

      OP, says something to me that’s very clear about your sense of humor that you didn’t see any of this. There is an entire layer of humanity that you’re missing in your day to day life. That makes me sad.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    My wife and I watched it when it aired, and we found it hilarious. It’s the absurdity of it. Should I know who this guy is?

    “Any questions?” “Yes! Several! I mean, he has a middle initial now?”

  • prowe45@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 month ago

    I personally really enjoy how David and the skeletons either can’t out won’t elaborate on the parts of their whole thing that the people are confused about. There’s just something funny to me about how it doesn’t seem like they’re intentionally being obtuse. They’ll gladly answer the vague question of “and the skeletons are…?” with the equally vague “part of it!” with a big smile, as though it was a perfectly fine and helpful answer.

  • Jordan117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a well-constructed skit – unabashedly silly, with just the right amount of ironic detachment. I love how after Pumpkins shows up, the couple just coolly analyzes the regular monsters that were making them scream moments before. The music is ridiculous, Tom Hanks demeanor is ridiculous, the dancing is ridiculous (with a dash of sexual weirness at the end). And it comes full circle with him genuinely scaring them in the end.

    I do think that them doing sequels and trying to spin a mini-franchise out of it was stupid though.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That went viral?

      It’s about as funny as most SNL, which is pretty much not at all. You’d think they’d get teleprompters that were a little closer to the camera at some point so it wasn’t so fucking obvious that someone can’t remember a line like “Any questions”.

      • kembik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        They don’t use prompters but paper cards and their reasoning is that the script changes up until the last minute but that doesn’t make any sense as it’s easier to update text on a computer than to rewrite a bunch of cards.

        They are superstitiously stuck in their ways at SNL, now Lorne says he’s not going to retire so I don’t expect it to get any better.

  • WeaselOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    It feels so real in how disappointing the experience becomes for the straight characters. That would be my reaction if I went into that thing to be frightened, and I get David S. Pumpkins instead. By the way, you’re not alone as I read years ago that Tom Hanks doesn’t get it either.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      It feels so real in how disappointing the experience becomes for the straight characters.

      This hits the nail on the head. It’s funny because of the point of view of the actual participants.

      The funny thing about this thread is that there are so many comments essentially agreeing with the central premise of the sketch, that it’s relatable and disorienting when you stumble onto some kind of established fandom and can’t seem to keep up with why it’s popular or what is or isn’t “part of it.” The popularity is confusing in itself, and the need to dissect the lore (as OP is doing, perhaps even unintentionally following the sketch itself) distracts from the original purpose of going there to be entertained.

      In other words, the sketch is funny and relatable exactly for the same reasons why much of the audience doesn’t find it funny and relatable.

  • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You are not a buzzkill, I think. This skit had a couple of things going for it:

    1. Halloween can always use more “mascots” and this is one.
    2. I admit that I originally didn’t like this skit, but my brother-in-law did, and I like him, so after watching it I always think of him until eventually it became something I genuinely liked.
    3. I quote lines from this skit to my SO all the time, so it’s become kind of embedded into my life.
    4. SNL during this time wasn’t very funny to me. I think that since SNL sucked during this time, even moderately funny skits ended up exploding in popularity just because they weren’t the usual onslaught of comedians stumbling over their lines and ruining jokes. Weekend Update was pretty funny, though.

    So in short, my friend, it’s not really funny. It was a moment, and you may have missed it. But let me say this, I think you’re cool for kicking off Spooky season…

    … Almost as cool as DaViD ESS pUmKiNs!

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve never seen it before now, and I loved it. (If you’re reading this and haven’t seen it, go watch it, because the one thing someone else mentioned in a comment would’ve been funny if I wasn’t expecting it.)

      The end of the bit was what really did it for me.

  • Uninformed_Tyler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t get Tracy Morgan. His jokes don’t seem that funny to me. He’s extremely repetitive. I don’t understand him. Then, one day I heard a comedian on a podcast describe him as a complete genius. He said Tracy’s trick is he tells a joke that may be funny, maybe not funny, and you’ll give him a little laugh. Then he repeats the joke ten times. It’s no longer funny. You’re just tired of hearing it. Then he repeats the joke ten more times, and somehow through the power of alchemy, it’s now run full circle and is the funniest thing you’ve ever heard every time he says it. I think this skit has that same energy.

    • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      !Wade Boggs’ Carpet World!<

      !Wade Boggs’ Carpet World!<

      !Wade Boggs’ Carpet World!<

      !Wade Boggs’ Carpet World!<

      And one last piece of advice, Liz Lemon, from someone who’s been on this side of the business for a long time:

      !Wade Boggs’ Carpet World!<

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve actually tired to explain how Donald trump is the complete opposite of Tracy Morgan for these reasons. Trump is dumb as hell trying to sound smart. The first time you hear what he says it’s funny because it’s so unbelievable; then reality sets in and it stops being funny. Sorry for bringing him up, but this is too coincidental to not mention

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not to be crass, but it almost seems like he’s gotten even more like that since his accident. Nowadays he says the most absurd shit, but just the way he says it and commits to it is funny.

  • Summzashi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a kinda funny joke. But the problem with American comedy in general is that they just can’t let something go. They milk that joke until there’s nothing left.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think part of what made it initially a sensation was how self-aware it was in how incredibly stupid and not actually funny it is.

    • Nunar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is exactly it. It’s not Tom Hanks, it’s the idea that it’s so stupid and they went all in. The viral part is beyond me. But I chuckle every time I see it because it represents some terrible idea shoved down your throat. And maybe it’s just me but it reminds me of the nonsense in Idiocracy. Just laughing at garbage. They’re laughing at themselves in the skit. 73 floors of David s Pumpkins? I’m surprised they found that many non-pumkins floors

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    Both absurdity and repetition can be funny and the sketch has both in uncomfortable number.

    I find it a bit grating, but I think that’s the point. And the sketch writers were clearly aware there was something (deliberately?) off about the whole thing which is why they make overt with DSP’s catchphrase.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sometimes humor is hard to explain. This sketch probably struck some chord with a fad for “random” things at the time, and maybe hasn’t aged very well.

    While the internet was of course influential in 2016, my recollection is that people weren’t nearly as jaded and cynical as they are now in the post-truth, post-pandemic world.

    We’re constantly bombarded with memes, jokes, and other distractions…so perhaps people are not so easily amused now as they were almost a decade ago.

    However, I do remember some folks being confused, annoyed, and unimpressed with it back then, too. But enough people were tickled by it to want to share it with everyone. And I do think Hanks brings a certain bizarre charm to it that not many comedians can pull off.

    • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      2016 is well after 9/11/2001… People where already very I jaded on the Internet.

      I suspect you where just too young to be jaded yourself yet.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s because it’s absolutely absurd and has nothing to do with Halloween. You have seen the whole skit and not just the memes, right? It’s basically a parody of Disney’s Tower of Terror ride but instead of spooky Halloween stuff, they got this dude just dancing around.

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is this why I am out of the loop? Is this a thing of American culture, or is it internet culture? Or both?

      In any case, I watched the video, found it funny. Harmless absurdity is fun.