YouTube suspends Russell Brand from making money off his channel — The suspension comes following the publication of rape and sexual assault allegations against the British star::YouTube has blocked Russell Brand from making money off its platform and the BBC pulled some of his shows from its online streaming service in the wake of rape and sexual assault allegations against the comedian-turned-influencer.

  • jetA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally every human on the planet is a “potential rapist”.

    So by your rhetoric nobody should be able to be employed or have a YouTube channel.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By your incel logic only proven rapists would ever suffer a single consequence of any type. You’d probably support a law that bans even making the accusation publicly until after a conviction. And this is one of many reasons women should avoid you.

      • jetA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your now assuming my political position and not addressing my words. We can disagree, I just ask you not insult me.

        • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah pretend not to understand the point I’m making, intentionally read words literally and ignore context, but it’s indeed me who is insulting here

          • jetA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            We cannot have a functional discussion if personal attacks and insults are involved. At that point how can we establish good faith discord?

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              We cannot have a functional discussion if you are arguing in bad faith, which you obviously did. This would not be recoverable at this point so no need to reply

              • jetA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I assure you I haven’t not been acting in bad faith.