• misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s quite boring. I’ve watched it once or twice and get how iconic and culturally significant it is though.

    • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s quite incredible if you think how well he immagined technology and how fantastic it looks for being 55 years old, which makes it almost look like a generic science fiction film, except that generic science fictions films look like that because he did it before the others. But yes, the pacing is reallly really slow and can be quite boring unless your interest is thouroughly studying every scene in it for it’s symbolic meaning and the cultural impact it had

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, sci-fi stuff was definitely boundary-pushing for a movie. Unfortunately our modern attention deficient brains are not compatible with lots of older movies. It makes me really appreciate classics that stood the test of time. Movies like 12 Angry Men or anything by Hitchcock or Kurosawa keep you at the edge of a seat even today.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      My issue with the film is the ending. Everything before the technicolored lights scene I really enjoy. While the ending is iconic, that’s the part I find boring. (And as a result leaves a boring taste in my mouth after watching.)