I wanted to share here that if people want to use Bluesky that the Tusky app has full functionality with Bluesky, so your privacy is preserved since Tusky is libre software.
Your link is neither tusky nor bluesky. It’s a bridge. Why not naming it? Even if facebook’s client was open source, it wouldn’t preserve privacy. The server is equally important.
Why use bluesky if we have Mastodon?
Other people.
No dogma or built-in censorship for unapproved statements and wrong think, or what is demed as having wrong opinions.
So what about this should entice me to join a unfiltered cesspool (according to your description)?
Instead of a multitude of differing moderation teams, you’re subject to a single one, BlueSky itself, I guess?
Anyone worried about moderation on a social media platform probably needs to think a little more introspectively though…
Removed by mod
It didn’t take long for you to prove their point for them, did it?
What did they say?
