• Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Probably less so

    Drag still prefers Steam over Epic, because of Epic’s horrible record of monopolistic and anticompetitive business practices. However, drag doesn’t have to choose, because you know who does let family share games for free? Fitgirl.

    • jetA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      probably less so

      Epic is less transphobic than steam because they never offered any game sharing, steam is more transphobic than epic because they have offered family game sharing… By extension of that logic that means … Offering an extra service like library sharing with family, is transphobic

        • jetA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          That just means epic is more performative, it doesn’t mean steam is transphobic

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yes. Steam’s lack of focus testing for the new family sharing is what shows their insensitivity to trans issues.

            • jetA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think what it certainly means is they’ve looked at the analysis of how the traditional family sharing has been working. And they see lots of geographically dispersed groups sharing libraries.

              I have a credible source tell me the original idea was that parents and children could share libraries. Because having multiple children and repurchasing your library multiple times is a burden for families.

              I think they’ve both improved the system, by allowing games to run concurrently, and reduced the unintended usage of their household sharing program. A program that only exists by the good grace of the publishers, by not being a threat into game revenue. If you can make the argument it’s a family sharing, and they would have bought the game once anyway, then it’s not a problem to share the game.

              I think they took the minimal cut that made this work, they could have done something ownerous like require everybody to upload IDs and prove a family relationship. But that wouldn’t scale, and it probably exclude lots of different odd family scenarios. This way they’re very inclusive. The only limitation is geographic pricing boundaries. They don’t want the one family member in Ukraine buying games for their distant family in the US at a discount. They are trying to do geofencing of the pricing.

              Like you said, if it is a big problem for adults, they can just pirate the games. Steam’s trying to make it as convenient as possible for a household to not have to repurchase games without becoming a pirate

                • jetA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yes it was a choice. It was not a choice based on people sexuality. You can dislike it, you can move to other platforms, you can pirate. But it wasn’t transphobic. They do not care about people’s sex organs

                  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    13
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    If you understand drag’s point that transphobia isn’t about intent, then why are you trying to persuade drag of your opinion by assigning intent?