• madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    When you make fun of something that really isn’t an issue it just makes your side look worse. Windows has real problems, but installing shit ain’t it.

    My dad can install anything on windows with clicks, he can’t do shit with a terminal.

    I’m a power user and love GUIs. I’ll use git desktop all day everyday, instead of typing shit in a command line. It’s one button press vs typing paths and hoping you don’t misspell shit.

    I don’t really get the whole command line fetish, there are no extra points in life for doing things the harder way.

    • Prok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The GUI app centers on most distros are quite usable without command line wizardry and reduces the risk of dodgey download sites

    • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah, yes. I also love it when I search for firefox on my new PC with Edge (without adblocker) and get sponsored malware in the results.

      I still use windows but I think installing software on Linux is way more convenient. Especially with the AUR.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A simple analogy is, would you rather have keyboard with a-z and symbols you can use to build words/sentences, or would you want a wordlist you can scroll and click, while expanding words in groups, and having to find non-frequent words with a lot of difficulty to make up sentences.

      Command line use is harder if you come from gui. But the main use case of command line are:

      • automation: anything you can do in a command line, can be copied in a script,
      • uniformity: every software now has almost the same format of use,
      • flexibility: gui almost always has less options than command line, and many times options are hidden within a lot of tabs and options.
      • Auto complete: whenever someone complains about terminal being hard to use and spelling mistakes I think about this. I think many people that come from GUI don’t know about auto-completion on terminal. It’s easy to see which options are available, easy to choose files, wildcards for multiple files, and all that
      • piping: command line allows you to chain one command with another. You have a command to list all your music files, chain that with a search command to search files within them. Now if you need to search in a python code, you use the same search command, just different command to read the file. You basically have lego blocks (old ones) that can be used to make anything.

      I can understand people being afraid of command line when they start, but I think many people come with biases and don’t use good terminal and other tools to make things easier.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yay -S app is hard? Or apt install app? Or flatpak?

      Being used to a habit doesnt make the habit the default way. Humans adapt quickly.

    • bradd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Power users are just regular users with an ego.

      GUI is like fast food, sure you can eat it and enjoy it, and you will live to see another day, but it’s inferior in every way to everything else. The real problem is that people start acting like fast food is the default food and start looking at people who eat raw or cook their own food or pay for food at a restaurant as being full of themselves.

      There are countless real advantages to CLI over GUI, but allowing people to use their computer effectively by fumbling around isn’t one of them.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    IDK, but I more often had issues with installing apps to Linux than to Windows, usually dependency-hell related ones, but once I had trouble enabling snap on Linux Mint.

  • Knightfox@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m preparing for a new computer build and I have some questions. I’m feeling really scorned by Windows 11 and its incompatibility with my current hardware as well as the overall sense of that my privacy is being invaded. I’m not super familiar with linux, but I have messed around with various distros.

    The build I’m planning to put together will likely use an AMD processor, but I’m uncertain about the GPU (definitely AMD or Nvidia). With my current build, RX 480 and i5-6500 I have found that in recent years I get massive artifacts in relatively old games such as Planetside 2 and Path of Exile (I also play Magic Arena quite a bit, but haven’t experienced any issues there). I even get screen tearing when watching youtube or amazon prime. It’s possible that my card is just dying, but considering that I don’t consistently see these issues across multiple applications I feel like it might be a driver issue.

    I’d really like feedback and to know more about Linux gaming (especially with the games mentioned) as well as experience with AMD, Nvidia, and Intel hardware.

    Thanks to anyone who responds.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      In my experience, gaming worked great on Linux Mint. Overall, you may encounter issues with online gaming but only because the servers will see you’re using Linux and decide you must be cheating. Not really an issue with Linux, more an issue with the devs not doing a proper job.

      ProtonDB is a good resource to understand what games run well on Linux and what issues you may encounter.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      For me, nvidia with proprietary drivers works great, just make sure to have correct dependency packages installed for vulcan etc. (should just work in most distros if their recommended way of installing nvidia drivers is used)

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t remember the last time I got a DLL error on my Windows laptop, honestly. I don’t think that’s ever happened on my current computer.

  • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I think mixing app and system dependencies is not the best idea, and Linux desktop is still fighting its impact.

    When all the apps on a consumer laptop is expected to depend on the same dependencies, the system likely run into dependency hell, which means many apps needs to be downgraded in order to keep older apps working.

    This mixture of system dependency and app dependency also prevents users to use the the latest version of an app on a hyper stable base system.

    Flatpak basically aim to solve this problem, where each app chooses their own dependencies, so you don’t need to downgrade all your app just because one app depends on python 2.7.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, Windows complaints tend to get pretty hyperbolic much of the time. It’s slow and annoying but I’ve always worked with it

      But the description of the Linux update process matches my experience with mint, pretty much. I even use the GUI update utility because it will put a little icon in the bottom corner of the screen. It’s quick even if I’m using a program that’s going an update, and if the kernel gets updated it’s just like “hey remember to reboot buddy!”

    • needanke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Besides missing dependencies or repositories for more nice software this kinda closely matches my experience though.

      (Ignoring winget, becaust it is not really the mainstream way to install windows software)

      What is your specific issue with this?

      • lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mostly that this hasn’t been my experience with Windows for like 20 years.

        They might as well bitch about dropping their punch cards.

        • needanke@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I still (have to) download scetchy executables on Windows when I want to install most programms, while on debian I can install most programs via apt and a few repositories. Even when it’s not a standard repo I still prefer it over random executables because while the security is just as bad at least I get updates without having to open the program itself.

          But what resonated with me most have been the restarts for updates. Happened way to often that I wanted to stop working but cant just shut down windows without updates and the accompanying reboots. (If I don’t check up in between to decrypt the disk on startups it’ll just sit there and run out the battery and I have to do the restarts on the next workday). On debian I just klick the power button, it hibernates (or I shut it down if I’m in the mood) and os updates are completely seperate from that.

          • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            What sketchy executables are you downloading?

            What makes downloading steam from valve more sketchy than allowing a Linux repo to run arbitrary code as root on your machine for every single one of thousands of pieces of software maintained by strangers?

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I remember going to source forge to download MPC-BE

              Later found out that they were adding adware to executables

            • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              All software is maintained by strangers.

              Some software websites just look sketchy but aren’t, which makes it harder for people to filter out the actual sketchy ones. That’s just the reality. Jokes about download pages with 4 download buttons also didn’t come falling out of the sky.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Literally

      My desktop/laptop experience for both is as follows:

      Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser (unless you count w98 “everything is a website” concept for the desktop or the far in between instances were a PC was offline/having issues and you need to download update packages)

      It also updated windows applications (ie office) but yeah it never intended to upgrade other stuff, all other software had their own auto update check

      I’ll concede the restart because yeah it does all for that

      But yeah Linux install is not without issues, and I’ll just remind everyone of how difficult it was/is to install a component driver when it’s not automatically found (wifi cards, disk controllers, and Realtek drivers anyone?)

      Yeah it does update your apps, as long as you have the repos, and restart wise I distinctively remember that you do need to do restarts after updates, be it major distro or not.

      Simple commands? I’ll concede that, as long as we remember the average Linux user is used to a less user friendly experience. Complain ask you want but for the average user, windows update experience works

      Thankfully I don’t need to deal with all that stuff now

      • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Windows update, at least since the inception of the concept has never required me to go to a browser

        In xp it still was an website which required IE due to activex used to do the updates.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I haven’t had a driver issue except for Nvidia where the driver exists, but it sucks

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          NVIDIA is the second biggest wankstain of a thing on my computer, unfortunately AMD didn’t put high end GPUs in laptops so there wasn’t a whole lot of choice.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I maintain a bunch of PC’s and 2 of them won’t update anymore with some vague error code that only has a microsoft community forum post as search result. I’ll get it fixed, but Windows update is not quite flawless and a non tech person would be lost at this point.

        People seem to be having a hard time grasping that most of the time it works great on both Windows and Linux. Majority of people will have a solid experience. But on both platforms, when things go to shit, you need to get your hands dirty. And with that final thought, I like to add that because of it’s openness, is usually easier to troubleshoot an issue on Linux because it doesn’t obscure what it’s doing unlike Windows (“Please wait…”, “Setting things up”, … dafuq u doin, it says 100%, is it doing anything still or is it hanging?). Windows’ vagueness has been a pet peeve of mine and it’s only getting worse. I’m perfectly ok shielding it by default, but give me a verbose option.

  • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Edge (Microsoft browser) thinks the Microsoft Teams exe installer FROM MICROSOFT SERVER is malware, no joke.

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Been using Linux off and on since 2003-ish. I remember the days of having to compile applications and having to download various dependencies. Linux now is so streamlined and easy. Minus gentoo.

    • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What? Once you set up gentoo properly, its as if not more streamlined than other distros

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine. What about clicking the download link on a webpage, clicking next a few times and having them software on your machine, compared to having to build something from GitHub (how many people here have never had to do that?).

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Compiling from GitHub is cherry picking the worst case especially for “most normal people” and frankly they should be using the software store GUI in their DE to install and update software with nice easy buttons to click.

      Frankly software management for a normal person generally is easier on Linux than it is on Windows for stuff made to run on Linux.

      But don’t worry someone will respond with nvidia’s shitty proprietary drivers.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This applies to pretty much all “Linux good, Win/MacOS bad” memes. I just assume that people either aren’t really serious about them and it’s just tongue in cheek, or they don’t have any contact with regular people.

      I used to work as a(n assistant to the) sysadmin and the things I got called over never stopped to amaze. For instance, there was a case when software was updated on the work machines and I got called because some lady couldn’t use Adobe Acrobat. “It is asking me something, I don’t know what”. I come over and it’s just a TOS Accept/Decline window.

      Some people do not understand computers to an extent that they can lock up in a state of confusion when a button has been moved 100px in any direction from its usual position.

      • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        or they don’t have any contact with regular people.

        This gets my vote, the memes are so disconnected from reality they feel forced and not funny

        • oo1@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Naah, i think they’re just ragebaiting all the MS fanboys.

          It works too judging by all the shit in this forum.

          The meme isn’t funny; but some of the reactions it provokes are hilarious. Though some of them are obviously counter-ragebait too. “Akshually i never have to restart to update windows since 2008”. :)

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine

      Maybe this is a problem that we should be addressing, rather than just making technology more of a black box, and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works.

      • twinnie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        But this is the classic Linux user mentality; Linux shouldn’t get easier, users should get smarter.

        If computers can be easier to use then why should people instead sacrifice loads of time learning how to operate them? Most people have other things to be getting on with.

      • Exec@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works

        Only two generations were got to be technologically literate.

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Greatest and Silent generations helped create computing, Boomers helped create important software such as DOS, Gen X and Millennials helped develop the Web, Gen Z is still going into computing and development jobs and Gen Alpha is too young to consider

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you have a driver’s license, do you know a car works besides the basic maintenance that is checking your oil and keeping the tires inflated? Some people don’t even do that last one, while it’s a thing you should check regularly.

        I think it’s a good thing the general public is able to use a computer without knowing the inner workings, but it also shouldn’t be obscured from them if they want to know/learn.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most normal people only ever use the browser. Even image or video editing is niche for the average person

    • aski3252@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unless you have a system without a GUI, you don’t need to open a terminal in order to update or install stuff. There is a GUI for that. And no, you don’t need to build stuff from GitHub for normal user stuff…

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not using the terminal is like buying a race car and not using the higher gears. I mean, you can, but what’s the fucking point?

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have a lot more fun in my performance car avoiding the top gears, actually. Like after 3rd im already losing my licence on the spot and getting bent over by the law, higher gears are just that but worse.

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I tried that on linux, it doesn’t work if you want to do more than browse the web and other basic stuff.

        You can do some seriously advanced stuff on windows using only GUIs

        • aski3252@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          We were talking about normal user stuff that normal users do, not “seriously advanced stuff”… And I agree that most normal users probably don’t want to use terminals because they are not familiar with them. But normal users probably don’t and shouldn’t do “seriously advanced stuff”, no?

          Yes, if you are trying to do “serously advanced stuff” (whatever that means), chances are you will probably need a terminal (or a terminal will at least be easier), but you shouldn’t be doing “seriously advanced stuff” unless you know what you are doing anyway…

          • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I just wanted to install steam, but it wasn’t in the package manager list.

            Then I tried apt-get and that didnt work, I forgot why.

            You don’t have to do seriously advanced stuff on linux to run into issues without using the terminal.

            My point was, even if you actually do some advanced stuff on windows you still don’t have to use the terminal.

            It’s not realistic that you don’t have to use the terminal on linux if you want to do any more than web browsing and some text editing, etc.

            That doesn’t mean that linux is bad, but let’s be realistic about what it is.

            • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              To install Steam on most distros with popular DE’s, you click the software store to open the software store. If Steam isn’t listed in the front page then just click the search box and start typing Steam.

              When you see it, click the install button.

              When it is done open it by clicking the Open button or pressing the Windows (or Super) key and type Steam. Click it when you see it.

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              That experience is highly dependent on the Linux distro you’re using. Steam comes preinstalled on gaming-centric distros like Nobara or Pop!_OS. More “general purpose” distros like Mint or Ubuntu might require adding an apt repository before you can install steam from their GUI package managers, but adding an apt repo can be easily accomplished with a GUI as well.

              Basically, if there’s no guide for installing steam for a given distro, or the process of installing steam is more than a couple easy steps, that specific distro probably isn’t well suited to run steam.

            • Tin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Weird, I would expect Steam to be in the Ubuntu repos (assuming that’s what you were using, since you mention apt), but maybe not. As for apt, or apt-get, they are just the terminal equivalent of the GUI package manager (synaptic? it’s been a minute since I ran ubuntu), so if something isn’t in the repos, apt at the terminal won’t find it either. If it’s not in the repos, you should be able to download and install steam from the website just like you would in windows. It gives you a .deb file which will launch just like an executable installer in Ubuntu. But to your point, yes, sometimes things in linux take a little extra thinking to get to work. Getting accustomed to the way Linux works can help overcome hiccups like this. Windows has many quirks as well, it’s just that if you use WIndows often you know your way around them.

    • IHateReddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      been using linux for a few years both on servers and my pc and I never had to build sth myself

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let’s also not conflate “ease” with historical behavior.

      Taking previous experience out of the equation, it is easier to type apt upgrade and reboot to update your entire system than to click through 300 times in the system and multiple apps with reboots.

      That is a fact.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t even need the terminal. There is a interface to update if you are using a DE.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Huh? 3 clicks to update Windows, Adobe, Office, that random text editor, VSCode, Steam, on and on and on…

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago
            1. Open powershell
            2. Type Winget upgrade --all
            3. Hit enter.

            It’s the same as most Linux distros, just different commands / syntax.

            • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Huh, looks like that would do my list above except the Adobe Suite. A shame that’s not on by default. Good info.

            • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Cool, if this works like how you are implying, then this is going to make my life a bit easier.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are…

      Let’s not cherry pick users then. I don’t care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Let’s not cherry pick users then. I don’t care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options

      Sadly no. They should be nervous if it’s about making changes to their system. In reality however Windows conditioned them to just click the button labeled “Yes” or “Okay” without even reading the pop-up in the first place.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          What? An OS install isn’t the same as installing / uninstalling something. Xp, 7, 10… I don’t restart when installing shit.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Only thing I can think of is installations that include drivers. And even then, not all of them.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you kill explorer.exe manually it doesn’t respawn. You have to star the process yourself again.

              Unless something changed in the past year.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  No. It’s not. I spun up a vm and killed explorer.exe. How long should I be waiting? Cause I"m several minutes in and explorer hasn’t restarted itself yet. Also tested it on my VR computer (only non-linux physical machine in the house).

                  Here I’ll even stream it for you. <removed>. I kill the process at basically 16:00(MST) it’s been 5 minutes now and the stream is going.

                  Edit: Over 19 minutes now… Still waiting for it to restart…

                  Edit2: Over an hour now… Still waiting for it to automatically restart. BTW the machine is windows 11. Latest patch/update.

                  Edit3: pulling the stream. Ran it for over 4 hours. The point is proven. It doesn’t restart itself.

  • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What the actual fuck are you smoking?

    At least update this meme to the 2010s if you won’t go to the 2020s

  • tsugu@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Open terminal

    See whether the app is in my distro’s repos, flathub, or snapcraft (It’s not)

    Go on the internet, search up the app’s name

    Download the AppImage (might be a virus)

    LibFuse2 is not installed (fuck me)

    Install LibFuse2

    Install Gearlever to integrate AppImage into my desktop

    I can finally launch the app

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Fuck, I hate AppImages so much. Never heard of gearlever, thanks i hope this helps a lot.

      Edit: Ok Gearlever is pretty great! Now I can finally open Heroic normally. That pissed me off for so long.

    • lseif@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      > doesn’t use arch/nix

      “why cant i find my package in the repos?”

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah yes, downloading builds from unvetted third parties and running their installers as root. Truly the Linux way.

          • jim3692@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            People can also use the Nix package manager on any distro, and run their apps using nix-shell, so that they don’t need to install as root.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          and this is different to windows how …?

          u do realize that u can (and should) read the PGKBUILD file? and check the git url which it’s cloning. or check the sha if its a binary package.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Clicking yes on the windows prompt for elevated rights for the installer to move things forward. Truly the Windows way.

          People don’t even read the prompts anymore, clicking yes as soon as it appears. So much better.

    • stetech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even if that’s needed, you can update apps w/o reboot usually (when sandboxed), and move opened files around (seriously wtf, Windows)…

      • tsugu@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        When the hell would I need to update my Windows because of an app update? I only restart when there is a system update, which you have to do on Linux too if you want your kernel to stay up to date.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, true.

          The whole “OS update when I want an app update” is because of how dependencies work on Linux. A library is installed once and referenced by any app that wants to use it. This way, an update in the library benefits all apps using it, as bugs het fixed. Also less storage is used when the one library is used by many apps.

          Windows programs keep their own versions of a library and hard link to that one. That makes the app more flexible. You can copy the app and it’s dependencies around and it will keep working. In this scenario multiple copies/versions of the same library can exist in the system, which takes more space.

          Of course there is some nuance. Both operating systems can have/use shared or hard linked libraries, but this is the general gist of it.

        • stetech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, it was what happened the last time I touched Windows in ‘22 (for work) – maybe a policy thing that a corporate app had elevated access and that’s why it forced a reboot on me for (some of the) “regular” app updates?

            • stetech@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Good to challenge misconceptions regularly, so thank you! :D

              On that topic… I assume not being able to move opened files (my “go-to” use case was a PDF in Acrobat) is still unfixed though, right? Seems like that’d require a major OS and applications change to be made possible.

              • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Why would you want to mv, not cp, a file that is actively opened by a file system. Is that even possible on Linux? I could swear I’m regularly blocked from manipulating things with open file descriptors.

                • stetech@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Like tsugu said. Have a file open for editing or whatever and realizing you’d like it to go into another directory. Of course you could just wait until you’re done and then move, or close, move and re-open… but that’s less convenient (e.g. throwing away current file’s edit history) and/or a risk of forgetting to actually do it, at least for me, lol.

                  Not sure about Linux, but I grew up on Unix (macOS), which forces applications (at least GUI based ones, CLI apps do whatever they want) to be able to deal with this, so that’s why I expected Windows to be able to do that as well. Alas…

              • tsugu@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                That I can confirm. Windows won’t let me move files if any app is using them. I sometimes do it by accident when I’m editin an office document, realize it’s in the wrong folder so I try to drag it to Documents. That won’t work. But I got used to it pretty quickly.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    • Camille@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unless you’re updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you’re using should do the trick.

        • Camille@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You do you, it can’t hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you’ll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

        • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Kde neon made me reboot Everytime it updated. Turns out there was a setting I could disable. Afterwards I was never bugged about rebooting.

          Used discover for updates

          Maybe you have such a setting?

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is the same on Windows, you can just carry on and then complete an update when you go to shut down the machine. Can’t remember the last time an app install or update required the whole OS to be restarted immediately.

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I tried installing rust which required some Visual Studio compiler on a Windows machine configured to reset itself when rebooted. It decided I needed a reboot. I’m glad I didn’t have unsaved files…

          Needless to say I could not run my program on that machine. Why does it need a reboot? I don’t know. It’s just meant to be a compiler.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Except when it force closes your computer when you dismiss the windows update too many times

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I remember what it’s called, but at some point there was an app for windows that would check if your machine actually needed a restart or not. Basically the “restart your machine” prompt is mostly just a boilerplate. It’s very rare that those installers touch anything that can’t actually be loaded without a restart.

              • Ziglin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Been running endeavouros for over a year on two machines. The only time I couldn’t boot was when the Nvidia drivers decided not to work with the LTS kernel anymore. So I just started the normal kernel and changed that to the default in my boot manager. This is the only issue I’ve had with it and it’s arch based. I really don’t understand the bad reputation.

                Also the arch wiki is applicable to most distros with only slight changes.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even with kernel updates, you can use something like ksplice or kpatch to update it without rebooting. It’s usually only used on servers though.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Besides a kernel update… Which one?

      Honest question, as I usually just restart to be sure I haven’t missed to restart a service or something, but theoretically I could restart every program and service, that got updated.

      Maybe Mint is very conservative here…

    • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Really? I need to restart my Windows less often, Fedora asks me every other day restart my PC to install updates

      • dabster291@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There should be an option in the settings to disable restarting to apply updates (though I only kno2 it exists on KDE)

        • Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Issue” implies that there is something wrong with it it’s simple a different release model, Fedora just got the newer packages, for example Gnome 43 on Debian vs Gnome 47 on Fedora (obviously I’m talking about the stable releases). If you prefer the Debian way of doing things that’s great but I don’t.

          • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Arch is on the bleeding edge and it doesn’t ask for a reboot. I think it asks for a reboot to load the kernel parts that have updated. Arch probably just assumes you’ll do it eventually, but if you don’t it’ll just keep running the current kernel.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Afaik mint just says you have to restart but don’t forces you. Iirc it was there to avoud any glitches which could be caused by apps interacting with each other in different versions(say some system app got updated and desktop environment is still the old since its loaded before update then cause gui mismatch due to different versions of ui toolkit)

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, in this case Windows doesn’t force you to restart either, you can just keep chugging along with the restart icon at the bottom right… That icon can stay there for weeks on my girlfriend’s laptop

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          But that is update and restart. The update is not at all installed and will only install if you restart. And it takes a lot of time. But here it is already installed and you can actually reopen apps ti get them in the updated state

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yep. I’m on EndeavourOS which is about as far as you can get from Mint without going to like Slackware, LFS, or BSD. Basically every single run of pacman prompts for a reboot. I’m sure I could restart individual services or subsystems instead, but that’s not what the OS popup says.

      • Despotic Machine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Redhat is not the original. Just of the ongoing projects, there is both Slackware and Debian, which are both older than Redhat. Redhat stands out because they are a commercial, for profit company, so they have more money and resources to invest in Linux development than most organizations, and they have a vested interest since it is their product base.

  • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    somepackage requires otherpackage version >10.1.79

    otherpackage is already at latest version

    Have fun compiling it yourself and messing up what is managed by the package manager and what’s not. And don’t forget that the update might break some other package along the way

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Don’t use apostrophes wherever you see an “s” at the end of a word. If you’re unsure about whether or not to use an apostrophe, just don’t. Because statistically, there are far fewer cases where you need 'em than there are cases where you don’t. Plus if you missed the apostrophe where it should be, people will just assume you didn’t bother to type it or it was a typo. Whereas if you do type it where it shouldn’t be, it’s a clear case of “this person doesn’t know how apostrophes work”.

    • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of the time you can just download a release and place the binary in path (or a symlink).

      Compiling it yourself should not ‘messing up’ anything, it should build locally:

      ./configure
      make -j$(nproc)
      

      Now it’s just built, nothing on your system has changed. make install will place requisite files where they need to go, but this generally configurable via prefix or equivalent. You may need to install dependencies, but that’s usually a simple exercise in reading the output from the configuration step.

      Compiling software is easy as fuck and is incredibly flexible.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I sometimes just give up and use Docker or a Flatpak (depending on if it’s a CLI or GUI app)

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Huh, pacman always seemed to automatically work out those dependency loops, or whatever you want to call them, when I was on EndeavourOS. The only time I had an issue with updating was when I went like two weeks without updating, and then ran out of harddrive space halfway through installing the 600 updates.

      I’ve been running Bazzite for several months now, and updating is absurdly easy and unintrusive. It’s basically impossible to fuckup (and if you do, it’s extremely simple to rollback). I can really see immutable/atomic being the future of Linux.

      • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well not if you’re on Ubuntu and need the latest version of e.g. npm for some nvim plugin, because that version is not in the repository.