“In alliance with the authoritarian regime, the [Russian] mass media has made the country a real ‘society of the spectacle,’”, says Ilya Budraitskis, a political and social theorist previously based in Moscow. Currently he is a Visiting Scholar with the Program in Critical Theory, UC Berkeley in the US.

  • taladar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t that always the case in authoritarian countries of all kinds since the invention of mass media?

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the case in pretty much every country, but it’s particularly bad in countries that have a lot of power and minimal oversight (Russia, the US, China, India, even the UK).

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mass media has held a great deal of power over us since its inception. Its full development is more recent in Russia and its exploitation more ruthless in some ways, but television has been shaping our realities since well before my childhood filled with American TV. It’s difficult to believe that all the cop shows didn’t constitute an important part of a system of positive feedback that contributed to developing the police violence problem that exists in America today for example. Not to mention the anti-drug messages covertly inserted into TV sitcoms by actual government propagandists, or the transformation of the TV news into pure entertainment after the demise of the fairness doctrine and the various shenanigans made possible by that.

    Given how powerful all that was (and still is) it’s difficult to imagine what it’s like when the state puts some serious effort into taking control of such a system and relying on it to convince people of things that make even less sense than did late 20th-century America. But given the adaptability of the Spectacle, seeing mass media “completely deprived of power” seems further off than is hinted at in the final paragraph there.

  • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh i still see a lot of bastards supporting Russia because its against capitalism (while being literally a genocidal feudalistic Dictatorship)

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russia hasn’t been against capitalism since 1989. Stupid tankies. Today’s Russia is their arch enemy, a capitalist fascist mafia state.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russia isn’t even against capitalism, they do their own super corrupt flavor of it for decades. Why else is the first thing coming to mind when someone says oligarch a super rich Soviet collapse profiteer?

    • Tomassci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s ironic, people be like “capitalism goes to fascism in crisis”, then when Russia actually does that they support it

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure capitalism is perfectly compatible with a genocidal feudalistic dictatorship.

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can just hear the tankies screaming western propoganda, NATO evil so Russia good. Screaming it so hard at the screen it vibrates their entire body until they need their sock changed. Do they make communist hot pockets?