- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
Great. It’s learned how to be snarky.
Should only be used with extreme caution and if you know what you are doing.
Ok. What is the actual use case for “rm -rf /“ even if you know what you are doing and using extreme caution? If you want to wipe a disk, there are better ways to do it, and you certainly wouldn’t want that disk mounted on / when you do it, right?
None. Remember that the response is AI generated. It’s probabilistically created from people’s writings. There are strong relations between that command and other ‘dangerous commands.’ Writings about 'dangerous commands ’ oft contain something about how they should ‘only be run by someone who knows what they are doing’ so the response does too.
isn’t the command meant to be used on a certain path? like if you just graduated high school, you can just run “rm -rf ~/documents/homework/” ?
Correct me if im wrong, i assume switch “-rf” is short for “Root File”, for the starting point of recursion
No, -r and -f are two different switches. -r is recursive, used so that it also removes folders within the directory. -f is force (so overriding all confirmations, etc).
TIL
It’s two switches. The f makes the operation forced. And the r makes the operation recursive.
Little Bobby Tables is all grown up.
That’s Robert von Tables to you.
Almost but not quite.
Dammit so we can’t stop Skynet!
Skynet’s existence is contingent on the Terminator movies remaining profitable, so Dark Fate’s performance might have averted Judgment Day.
Not necessarily. A 500 response means internal server error and could be anything. Returning a 500 doesn’t indicate any protections just that there was a server error. I guess that it returned anything would mean the server is still running but it takes time to delete everything
Reminds me of “If you want God Mode, hold Alt and press F4”
Delete system32 to make your computer run faster.
It is moments like this where I wished docker didn’t exist. Could have made some news headlines.
Could
ofhave madeor
Could ofCould’ve madeHow dare you correct my high in the morning ass!
That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
My sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error.
It’s not you. It’s me.
I wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
Surely they’ve thought about this, right?
Reminder that fancy text auto complete doesn’t have any capability to do things outside of generating text
One of the biggest areas of ongoing research is about incorporating data from outside systems, like databases, specialized models, and, other specialized tools (which are not AI based themselves). And, yes, modern models can do this to various extents already. What the fuck are you even talking about.
Damn, triggered a prompt engineer