• Zink@programming.dev
    2·
    3 days ago

    Gendered bathrooms should not need to exist because bathrooms should have some dammed privacy.

    In the US, there’s a door for boys and one for girls. Behind each is a giant room with some sinks and some toilets that may as well be using cardboard and tinfoil for privacy.

    Go somewhere more pleasant like Sweden? You have a short hallway with 3 or 4 doors on each side, and behind each is a small restroom including a sink and a mirror.

    Every real and maga-hallucinated bathroom problem largely solved.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    1·
    4 days ago

    I went to a board game convention a month ago, it was the first time I’ve girlmoded for something major. They put their own signs over the bathroom signs explaining that both were gender neutral and the only difference was urinals vs stalls. That made it soooo much easier on me and I was very glad

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      4 days ago

      Indeed, I’m a furry and a few conventions I go to, even in red states, have temporary rebranding of the bathrooms to gender neutral for the duration of the convention as a requirement that the Hotel must maintain in order to keep the convention’s business.

      And since furries are either suspiciously wealthy or poor, but dedicated, it’s a wise economic decision for said Hotel.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      1·
      4 days ago

      I’m a dude and i want stalls every time. I HATE pissing in a urinal next to a bunch of other people and get piss splashed on everything. So so so many bacteria.

  • Sage the Lawyer@lemmy.world
    0·
    3 days ago

    This is in my hometown!! Absolutely one of my favorite spots. And I cheered out loud when I saw this response a couple days ago. I/O is legendary.

    • BangCrash@lemmy.world
      1·
      3 days ago

      They should paint a door on a brick wall and label it “super male”. And have a sign saying “dorry you aren’t male enough”

  • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    0·
    4 days ago

    Overhyped. i don’t like the comment above. they make it seem like a big thing. i don like these kinds of posts…

    when a post has “absolute legend” as the title, that reads to me like a youtube title like “We DESTROYED <popular thing> FOREVER!” or “This EASY trick is a GAME CHANGER”. gooooddddd (im in complain mode now sorrii)

        • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          0·
          4 days ago

          *nununununu!!!* please understand that I’m angry at the reddit post with the annoying youtube title, not the repost here on Lemmy. On thus post, “No” is a pretty good title I think. it’s not overselling it, it makes sense within the context of the funi and it’s not an overused buzzword.

          the REDDIT POST on the other hand! it goes out of it’s way to be annoying. it repeats the the same meaning using different words. it pretends like this is a big thing: some employee replying with no to some comment about thir game. It’s boring, overblown and who cares. It would have been funier if the reddit person just reposted the post and didnot add a dum and long subtitle to it. WHAT IS THIS? prepare for my next game, named Calm Compass: A side adventure in a parallel dimebsion. (very out of context, yes, srryy)

          have I now become the one to overblow and overreact? am I now saying the same thing with many words? YES! ON PURPOSE!

          im sori next time I will ramble shorter.

          Also

          Alright, that’s gonna be it for this round of Smorty COMPLAINS about your somewhat well known topics! Tune in next episode, where I discuss, that AI is actually BAD for the internet and that it is RUINING the internet and that AI features are BAD and that OpenAI is now putting its LLMs into MURDER DRONES (not a joke btw) and that GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS ARE USELESS NOW BECAUSE IF AI!!!<|endoftext|>