The image is clearly AI generated, and the content looks incredibly suspicious as well considering the way it’s structured.
I’m just going to report this.
Mosts dev article theses day have ai generated images.
Well, they shouldn’t. It makes them look less trustworthy.
That’s what you think.
I know the image is, but I didn’t think the content was, he has a GitHub linked from the website (https://github.com/cwoodruff) and he certainly seems like a real dev/person
I didn’t claim there wasn’t a real person behind this. Did you check the profile you linked? They “wrote” an article titled “I asked ChatGPT how to overcome Imposter Syndrome”. That already proves they use generative AI at least for some things. How do you explain the suspicious AI-like structure of the article?
It is my opinion that any “real” creator would not touch AI with a 10-foot pole, if just out of respect for fellow creators.
Quill report: 0% of text is likely AI Human-written 100%
For developers, AI has become a part of the production line. It is quite simple: developer asks AI to generate a piece of code that creates a piece of code to communicate with Lemmy servers. Then the developer changes the code so it fits the application, using the knowledge they acquired during training, their work, etc.
If you can’t handle that, then better not use any of the new software releases anymore, because 90% has some code in there that was touched by AI.
I’m really enjoying working in Rust. But damn do I miss the completeness of C#. Microsoft absolute spoils us with System and Microsoft libraries with superb documentation.
In rust you spend most of the time re-inventing the wheel because the std library is bare and third party libraries are mostly undocumented nightmares.
