Blaze@lemmy.zip to Privacy@programming.dev · 16 hours ago[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ?message-squaremessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up118arrow-down1message-square[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ?Blaze@lemmy.zip to Privacy@programming.dev · 16 hours agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has 900 users / day 1.58K users / week 2.86K users / month This community has 61 users / day 220 users / week 483 users / month
minus-squarejetAlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·14 hours agoI would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.
minus-squarePhilipTheBucket@ponder.catlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·14 hours ago I would say they are endorsing it by using it I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you’re responding to. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it’s important.
I would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.
I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you’re responding to.
Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it’s important.