NSFW’d for language.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this case I’m using to to mean compelling to people with a brain, not just “history channel made a speculation so I’m sold”

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you’re taken in by conspiracy theories, it’s not because the information is compelling-but-unseen, but rather because you want to believe that

      A) information that confirms your biases is true

      B) you are privy to knowledge others don’t have.

      These two things reinforce one another.