• Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It really boils down to a few reasons:

        • I don’t like ads, and I prefer not to see them
        • Running a platform like YouTube is not cheap, and I understand that Google needs money to keep things running.
        • The revenue of Premium is split between YouTube and the creators, much like ad revenue is. So it also supports the channels that I follow.
          • Humanius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That hasn’t stopped me from using other Google services like Gmail, Docs, or Drive either.

            If I ever decide I want to opt out of Google’s ecosystem I’ll just serve them a GDPR data deletion request.
            That’s what I did when I deleted my Twitter account as well.

          • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you don’t want to be tracked, you shouldn’t own a smartphone.

            Because let’s face it, you’re never going to be able to stop it unless you get rid of all your tech.

            • xts@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tracking != taking all of your data and selling it for profit. That’s what Google does with YouTube, even if you pay for premium. So I see no reason to pay for it.

              Not to mention a premium sub costs more than most streaming services out there, including double the price of lots of Plex shares that have thousands of movies and shows to watch.

              • Anus B. Samus @feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t understand the Google selling data argument. I thought Google was an ad broker. Someone goes to Google and says I want to play ads on YouTube for my awesome baking book, play it for people who are into baking. YouTube has the watch history of people and is able to tell who watches a lot of baking content. That’s not selling data to someone in my books as the advertiser does not receive any personal details about the people where the ad is played. He is just buying impressions. Or am I missing something?

              • If_Its_Kitsch_I_Sits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see your point, but it assumes I want other streaming services or content. I have YouTube Premium to avoid ads. The content I watch is almost exclusively YouTube creators.

                That and paying for other services isn’t free of tracking either.

                I guess I’m resigned to being the product in some instances.

            • Anamana@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Imo it should be a choice whether we are tracked for monetary gains or not, and not a necessary evil. But with most basic services/devices you are not even presented with that choice. E.g. when buying a phone.

              And if you do have a choice, sometimes accessibility is restricted so much that you can’t participate in our networked society.

              I think we have to find ways to provide access to the most basic services with a minimum of tracking. Anything else should still be an option of course.

              How to achieve this? I don’t know. But EU regulations certainly wouldn’t hurt for now.

            • SmallAlmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re objectively wrong. You can have a fully free and open source android rom without any spyware (not even from google) and be free, and I also use Piped for watching youtube because I don’t have a google account. Check out privacy communities on lemmy.

              Edit: And about getting rid of all tech, of course you can’t be 100% independent and have 100% privacy, but you can mitigate most of it if you know what you’re doing.

              • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Many years ago I tried that, and found out that privacy is possible, but the cost is incredibly high.

                By using pi-hole I was able to find out if my mobile phone was communicating with Google. As long as I had GAPPS on LineageOS, there was plenty of traffic. When I removed GAPPS, the traffic went quiet, but my phone became severely crippled.

                Sure, I still had some smart apps on my smartphone, but I was also cut off from my bank, so basically living without money in todays society. Not really a viable option. Also, updating apps from fdroid was incredibly inconvenient, but I hope that issue has been fixed now.

              • xts@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, sorry but you’re wrong. Your phone will still ping towers it’s near, those pings are logged. You’re being tracked as long as you carry a smartphone.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t know the channels get some of the revenue. Do you get to influence who the money goes to? Like a twitch prime sub?

          • WxFisch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It replaces the ad revenue the channel would otherwise have gotten from your view, at a higher rate than an ad impression.

          • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Basically a percentage of your premium is divvied out based on watch time. When I signed up it was half of my payment went to creators, I don’t know the current split though

      • ipipip@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me its solely because of a ad free experience on my TV, since its the primary device I’m using it on. And i got it relatively cheap from turkey so it’s not that big of a deal. I might reevaluate if the price increases though.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because I use YouTube more than every streaming app and my Plex server combined. And the creators I watch get money and I don’t have to see ads

      • Relo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got premium because I have ADHS and need to listen to something when I want to sleep or do chores. With premium I can turn my phone screen off of let it run in the background.

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Dunno if you have iOS or Android, but on Android you can also just use Newpipe :)

      • _finger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use it so much for work that I just can’t rely on a typical ad blocker and I can’t justify not paying for it at this point.

      • Iridium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not bad if you max out the family subscription (5 members) and use YouTube music.

        Still, I’m a hypocrite because I absolutely hate their habit of hiding features behind the paywall, and making ads more obnoxious to irritate users into paying for premium.

        • ToastyBanana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ya’ll should just VPN to Argentina and get the sub for cheap, it’s a few bucks per month compared to the obnoxious 13.99.

          I pay around 2€ for mine per month plus the VPN fees, it’s a no-brainer

        • Anamana@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah ok, certainly makes sense for ur usecase. I didn’t meet anyone who was YouTube music yet. Does it have high quality audio or is it just YouTube quality?

    • persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ditto. It is my most used subscription.

      I watch more YouTube than cable (never) or Netflix (maybe one binge a month).

      I use it for music in the car and at work.

      I play audio from some sciencey channels while I try to goto sleep.

      I’ll probably keep paying. I do get value out of it.

      • Blackout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would dump Netflix before cancelling YT Premium. Everything on Netflix I can stream for free from pirate sites to my TV. YouTube actually has tons of informational and educational content and a premium subscription lets me support it without the ads. I probably watch YouTube twice as much as all my other vid subs combined.

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been so annoyed with the ads that I’ve started to go elsewhere for instructional content.

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m technically still sharing a Netflix account with my parents, though I rarely use it at this point.
        Whenever I want to watch a movie, and I check Netflix, they don’t have it. (It’s worth pointing out that I’m not in the US)

        In contrast, YouTube Premium gives me pretty much exactly what I seek from it. Videos from channels that I follow, but now without ads.

    • Kekzkrieger@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you hopefully mean you had a prem subscription, the more people quit because of price policy the better it will be for everyone

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah, because historically, whenever a large internet platform starts losing money, things definitely get better for everyone. Nevermind Reddit and Twitter and Meta and Netflix and Hulu having to nickle and dime users for basic functionality of their platforms, things are definitely better. I love all those raised prices and lowered quality of service.

        Right.