• evan@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably desktop. Or desktop and android. Remember that iOS locked down the browser years ago and require any third parties to run on safari’s bones.

      • 1chemistdown@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chrome and Firefox are building iOS browsers that do not require the apple WebKit. Everyone, including apple, expect apple to drop that requirement soon to help avoid antitrust issues.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          expect apple to drop that requirement soon to help avoid antitrust issues.

          I’m surprised it took this long.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Definitely not Android. Firefox is unfortunately quite a bit slower than Chrome based browsers. I still use it as I don’t really do much on my phone, but I hope they can optimize it further.

        • DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use Firefox on android (specifically fennec f droid) and i use it since ublock origin can be installed and my fennec is hardened too

  • trepX@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use FF to help keep the browser “market” competitive. We don’t want to end up in the same situation as early 2ks where html standardisation was essentially “internet explorer compatibility”, and if you wanted to use newer features as a web dev you had to put multiple implementations, one for IE, and one for the others, as in the browsers actually implementing the specifications correctly. Now MS didn’t exactly do nefarious things with their market power, it was rather neglect, but it damaged the industry nevertheless. For Google, in today’s market, I’d anticipate they would use it to make it very difficult to block ads etc. Internet will become less free.

  • donut4ever@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy fact. Firefox, for me, has ALWAYS been much faster/stronger on YouTube than any chromium based browser I’ve used. Better than chrome on their own site. This makes it even better. I love this browser.

  • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Speed almost doesn’t matter for me, since Chrome allows ads and Firefox actually lets me use adblockers and privacy badger. The time wasted on ads are way larger than the time spent loading a page.

  • iod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox in general is faster for me than Chrome in many pages

    However a notable exception are web games and web based game emulators. They’re a lot slower on Firefox and i get horrible sound crackling whereas on Chrome its much better. It’s been like this for years with no seeming improvement.

  • henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great, now implement modern exploit mitigations and sandboxing like Chrome uses. Firefox is objectively less resistant to exploitation. Some Firefox security has improved since the article was written, such as some sandboxing on Windows, but it’s definitely not as mature.

    I’m not writing that Firefox is insecure. Security is very important to Firefox! However, Chrome has had more work done in the realm of browser hardening.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is fair, but Chrome is undeniably more open to corporate exploitation. See things like the dramatically reduced utility of ad blockers on Chromium browsers.

      I guess it depends on who you see as the greater threat at present.

    • richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forced to with work.

      I utterly hate it. I don’t have it on my personal setup or android mobile - been using Firefox for twenty years now, not gonna stop!

  • Morphior@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been using Firefox for basically as long as I can remember and I love it. However, there’s one website that I go to Chromium for: GeoGuessr/Google Street View. For some reason it’s unbelievably slow and sluggish in Firefox whereas it works normally in Chromium. Why could this be? To be clear, it’s only the Street View part (and moving/panning/zooming) that’s slow on GeoGuessr.

    • blueson@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It wouldn’t surprise me if the implementation has bias towards Chromium based browsers as both street view and Chromium are from Google.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were literally caught artificially slowing down page loads and responsiveness on non-chrome browsers a while back.