I think I’ve settled on the latter. Disagreement is maybe best communicated by the absence of an upvote? And downvotes work best when they signal something that is just off base, and while not reportable, is not appreciated at a broad cultural level.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The problem is that there’s no way to enforce this in practice. All of these conversations about voting culture, with examples and pontificating always just come off as “everyone who drives slower than me is a grandpa, everyone who drives faster than me is a lunatic.”

    Downvotes will always be an “I disagree” button no matter what anyone wants or thinks.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why the Beehaw way is a good approach. No downvotes only upvotes. Then people actually have to tell why they disagree.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people on Lemmy right now are not using them in that way. As we grow, misuse of downvotes will almost certainly become more common, but right now people are self-policing their behavior for the most part

      • effingjoe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those of us on kbin can see who up/downvotes. I’ve noticed, anecdotally, that once this became more wildly known, there have been fewer downvotes that mean “I disagree”, with them mostly being used on troll posts or obviously bigoted posts.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m aware of that and I like that behavior.

          I’m also wary of potential downsides though. I think in smaller communities it could be a problem because people might start fights with each other when they check who downvoted them. But I’m not sure, at least now we have a good test environment on kbin, and so far it seems to be beneficial based on what you’re saying.

          • effingjoe@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s overall good. A vote is no longer an anonymous action-- it’s personal, just like leaving a comment supporting or disagreeing would be. While I don’t think it would ever be appropriate to harass a person because they up/down voted something, I do think people should have to make the mental calculation about whether they’re willing to have any specific up or down vote available for anyone to see.

            • harmonea@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it’s done more good than harm and don’t want to see them anonymized again… but I do have to say I’ve found myself withholding a downvote that I think was completely justifiable and deserved because I didn’t want to be the first and only one and get shit for it.

              • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is kind of why, I feel like it is a bad thing. People can’t vote normally or are afraid to do so in a way.

                Some won’t use the vote system to avoid possible trouble (arguments, downvoting back etc).

                I personally have started to care way less about the upvote and downvote stuff. Reddit made it clear to me that it means nothing.

                It just internet points and if something goes wrong, it’s all gone anyway.