It’s not that weird, even Trump has done things I agree with on a rare few occasions (off the top of my head ending the minting of new pennies).

Even then, it feels dishonest to hide when such a historically unreliable tool is being used.

Why bother, nuclear and renewables care equally little about oil prices and have close to identical carbon footprints.

Only if they can still find buyers at the inflated price. I’m not aware of any consumers buying RAM right now, so I doubt they would be able to.

There are legitimate reasons to ask for an “all permissions” token, such as setting up and using a third party client. A game is not one of the things that should be asking for that though.

My assumption is that primary related mud slinging depresses enthusiasm among the public for the incumbent, combined with attempts at it only being made when the incumbent is relatively unpopular anyway.

It’s not a thing that happens often, but as far as I can find every single time the incumbent president has had someone try to primary them, the incumbent’s entire party lost the seat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_challenge

From what I’ve read the reason primaries aren’t done on incumbents is because every single time it’s been tried the incumbent lost the actual election and the seat went to the other party.

“Some of you may die, but it’s a sacrifice I am willing to make”

That… is what I said yes. Cameras (I said traffic because I include school zone cameras in that category) detected these cars speeding and issued a ticket to the vehicle’s owner, who in these examples is probably the driver, but because the tickets were automatically issued and the cameras can’t reliably identify the driver there are no points on the license.

The registered owner does get fined, and in extreme cases like this probably should have their license revoked, but overall I do actually think it’s for the best that an automated system can’t take away your license.

So long as there’s a proper primary I don’t see the harm in this, not really. I can’t see her running a good enough campaign to make it through the primaries, at least not without also having a good enough campaign to beat the fascist party after Trump.

Because this data was collected from traffic cameras, which slightly limits the actions that can be taken (notably, because they can’t prove who was behind the wheel there are no points on the license). IMO what you should be asking is why has the NPD not stationed a traffic cop around each of these places specifically to catch these guys.

Didn’t the senate just vote to stop this basically along party lines, failing because there are more republicans right now?

It is specifically Tesla I don’t trust, but they are also the loudest about “full self driving” by a lot. And before you tell me Tesla is better than human drivers they are the company that intentionally obfuscates any details from incident reports involving their vehicles and are the cars that have “max max mode”.

They abandoned the standalone linux mod manager with the intention of making Vortex itself run on Linux, specifically targeting SteamOS.

Because I know I’m never going to buy a self driving car (or at least not any time in the next 20 years) I’m not particularly annoyed by the risk of me owning one. My concern is instead with someone else buying one and then hitting me with it, because I keep hearing about how Teslas specifically are way worse than a human at driving around and not getting into “accidents”.

self-driving cars

Ew, fuck off. I don’t trust those things being on the road near me, not with how much worse they are than human drivers right now.

Edit: To be clear, my complaint isn’t about me buying a self-driving car. My concern is someone else buying a self driving car and it hitting me as either another driver or a pedestrian.

At the very least, didn’t Sam Altman/OpenAI say they intend to have these exact same restrictions?

Correction, it doesn’t need to be involved in a crime, the cops just need to pretend to think it might have been.