• 0 Posts
  • 218 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Dwarf Fortress.

    And, I mean pre-steam release.

    The ASCII graphics, controls and everything about it were not appealing to me. I started playing it because of the Boatmurdered story and some friends trying to recreate that. We started playing and rotating fortresses on a random Friday night.

    And once things started to click? I put way too much time into it. I’d eventually mod it and make it easier to play but I put many many hours into it.

    I wouldeventually put the game down after that initial burst and then years later the steam release came, making it much more enjoyable and well… A couple thousand hours later I still keep going back to it.









  • I like to think I’m a tech savvy parent and the amount of tooth gnashing to setup and maintain child accounts is incredible. I’m convinced the foxes guarding the henhouse are using dark patterns to make parents give up.

    Why can’t I just get a notification on my phone saying “Hey, kiddo wants to have screen time. Approve?”

    Hell, I’d love a notification saying “Kiddo started watching Mr. Blah.” If I got the notification and I didn’t want them watching that, I could block the video, or creator with a click. WHY ARE WE NOT AT THIS LEVEL OF CONVENIENCE?

    A LOT of these concerns would go away if phones/tablets/tv’s had these simple controls. Move those privacy controls into the home and MAKE them so easy a neanderthal could operate them.

    If I have to *.newsocialbook.com into my router, you can bet your damn ass that “LiveLaughLoveMom<3” is going to keep demanding that someone else do it for her.








  • I sure did! And I read the rest of the words around that!

    What’s your point? Mine was that if you take a few sentences, remove the context, the meaning is different.

    CNN is saying that what people were told previously (that he was just paranoid) is actually justified.

    A better example of what this tweet and thus this lemmy post are going for would probably be links to articles previously saying he was just paranoid - particularly if it was also CNN saying it. 🙃


  • Thank you. So the context, which the screenshot of a screenshot doesn’t show you is that these are the final paragraphs summarizing the rest of the article (which is cut out) was all about how the CIA was very much involved.

    Reading the whole thing* in that context* I don’t see the cognitive dissonance - more, that it’s agreeing that he was right all along that the CIA was in fact fucking around with their country.