So this is why pokemon never made a 3D realistic game.
So this is why pokemon never made a 3D realistic game.
deleted by creator
A lot I can contribute. Saved for posterity.
I hate this article so much. It makes it sound like a conspiracy theory. It doesn’t explain the organizations and laws explicitly made by the core to exploit the periphery, throughout the ages.
I should make an analogous page on prole wiki
You need money to start a paper.
It’s hilarious that there’s a sub for this
TLDR: they shouldn’t have been there in the first place
Saudi actually supports Israel.
For all you downvoters, Israel owns all of Palestine’s infrastructure and keeps them perpetually in debt.
As opposed to the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie that we have now?
Turkey needs a visa?
The main way to make money off stocks is actually to use marxism.
If you’ve read and understood Marx and Lenin, then you can use the theory to make great returns. It’s simple. Just find the most exploitative, evil, reactionary company in the most exploitative, evil reactionary country (the US) and invest in that. I’m talking about companies like mueller industries, Berkshire Hathaway, and HCA.
The US will do whatever it takes to give returns to “their” capitalists. The market has proven this theory time and time again.
Praxis, but bourgeois praxis.
Money to commodity to (more) money, which is a simplification of capital accumulation, as described in capital vol 1
No. The amount of stock you can afford, the influence you have over the company, and the amount of benefit from owning stock is negligible compared to actual bourgeois.
Saying that you own the company by buying shares from robinhood is like saying America is democratic because you get to vote.
Three letter agencies
I heard you guys are transitioning to Canadian LNG by the end of this year
I think it’s going to be like mad max leading up to the collapse, and actual collapse will be the installation of a proletariat dictatorship.
I say this because as profits fall, right wing reactionaries will be mobilized to control the workers to prevent unionization and strikes, similar to the Jan 6 insurrection in the US and the trucker parade in Canada.
As conditions become unsustainable for life, there will be revolutions throughout the states.
Communism is when the state does stuff.
Decades of lies spread against communist countries, painting them as a totalitarian surveillance state. Like, when’s the last time your vote counted? Hell, when’s the last time there was a candidate that actually represented you? I’m not even gonna start on the TLA’s.
I’d say it’s a good start but it’s not enough for any material change. That can only come from the collapse of the American empire (as we know it). Also, imperialism from the global north is not limited to the US.
In the end, it’s not size, but control. The implication that size = control is only applicable in a globalized economy. If the core countries adopt more isolationist policies then China’s influence on core countries will be reduced.
A larger China would strengthen bipolarity/multipolarity, which is a good thing, and would stabilize the situation we are observing currently, and aid in the development of socialist states. But having a strong China wouldn’t necessarily mean the collapse of the core.
It’s a question of quantitative change vs qualitative change, as described by Mao. Reform vs revolution.
deleted by creator