I voted for Harris, but obviously that didn’t work out, did it? If you honestly think republicans would go back to the center after trump is gone then you don’t understand republicans.

Zeng also touched on Musk’s leadership style in the Reuters interview, particularly his tendency to set ambitious timelines. Zeng noted that Musk often promises delivery times that are shorter than realistically achievable, a strategy Musk reportedly employs to “push people.” This approach has led to skepticism in the industry and among consumers, especially regarding promises about technologies like full self-driving.

Not just to push people, but also to keep investors hyped about the company. He’ll throw out all sorts of random crazy vaporware like robots, the full self-driving feature, and robotaxis to keep the stock price in the skies as investor imagine boundless potential. It’s perhaps the main reason why the company is valued at more than the next big dozen or so automotive companies COMBINED: https://companiesmarketcap.com/automakers/largest-automakers-by-market-cap/

I would get into fierce arguments on the internet to insist that we must vote for the lesser of two evils every election so that we get that dictatorship a little later instead of right now.

Trump and his crony “justices” wipe their ass with the constitution.

lol what a bunch of morons! They should have stuck to voting for the pro-israel democratic party!!!

This is why it’s silly hearing billionaires, who do the most damage to our planet, telling us how urgently we need to “get off this rock” which has supported life for millions of years in favor of some dead planet. It’s really just an extension of capitalism that demands infinite space to exploit, instead of being content with sustainability.

They got ignored by the people they petitioned for help.

Anti-genocide protesters did more than just pick up a phone and call. We all saw the result.

I can vote for them while criticizing their support for genocide and their generally idiotic political strategy. The other party being worse doesn’t change this.

How would adding who I voted for change my first post?

How? I voted for Harris. It was the democrats who supported genocide and then lost against a clown for the second time.

The “better choice” argument is used by democrats to follow republicans deeper and deeper into the right wing because as long as democrats are slightly less fascist, they’re technically the “better choice”. Now we’re at the point where democrats are full-throatedly supporting genocide. You know, something that literal nazis are known for. Put that in your notes.

They should’ve voted for democrats, who also love genocide. Seriously, the only “leopards ate my face” I see are democrats insisting on supporting genocide and then predictably losing support from voters. These voters were just desperate for any possibility of change, no matter how slim. This is understandable when the change they were hoping for was to not have a president that supported genocide. This doesn’t deserve mockery, no matter how misguided.

The US has been involved in war for almost every single year of its existence, so actually it’s easy to say even when one’s home country is involved in a war.

What about the veterans on the other side of those wars? Do you celebrate them as a “super man” (übermensch)? I’m sure they thought they were fighting for a good cause too.

People need motivation to vote. A selective tax credit or “other guy bad” simply isn’t enough. You can complain all you want about how stupid people are for not voting against fascism, but if you cannot face the reality of voters and how to get them to vote then how much smarter can you really call yourself over others? This is a lesson that apparently needs to be learned every election yet never seems to be learned.

Panic buying like this only leads to more price increases. I just buy the minimum, like usual.

A fourth person with severely impaired vision also experienced gains in their sight, but they did not last.

Bharti says it isn’t clear what exactly caused the vision improvements. It’s possible that the transplanted cells themselves proliferated in the recipient’s corneas. But the vision gains could also be due to the removal of scar tissue before the transplant, or the transplant triggering the recipient’s own cells to migrate from other regions of the eye and rejuvenate the cornea.

These parts are a little concerning to me, but I’m still hopeful.

In other words: “tesla stock went up”

The numbers are made up.

The most realistic portrayal of a dystopia.