From my point of view HP printers are a bad investment.

  • @luciole@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    135 months ago

    Yeah, it’s the “loss leader” strategy. Some HP printers are very cheap, sometimes cheaper than the cartridge you need to put in it. They’re doing it ridiculously aggressively.

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      I wonder whether they’d sell more if they put the prices up but promised no further charges or restrictions? It would give them a unique market position as a seller of premium trustworthy products. Brother is the closest to that at the moment, though their printers aren’t even more expensive. HP is certainly to be avoided.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        If you cared about price per sheet and you print a lot, then you’d have a better printer than an ink jet.

        HP pulls this shit because that business model works for people who need to print a little.

        • @luciole@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          Ink jet cartridges dry up when they’re not used often enough though, which screws people who don’t print much as well. HP just screws everyone equally.

          • @ErilElidor@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            I had a printer from HP but rarely had to print anything. It happened way too often, that I had to buy a new cartridge, because the old one dried up. Soo annoying… Now I have a laser printer from brother and it’s much better! No more drying up! I guess this is more about technology than it is brand, but it somehow was fitting here😄

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            I’m talking about the difference between using an ink-jet or something more expensive like a laser printer.