I spoke the other day about rich people whingeing that they don’t have enough to retire in luxury. In today’s news there is a 67 year old man who hates his job and wants to retire. However the poor thing only has $700K saved up. This only gives him $28K a year in interest. sadness Poor old dear still hasn’t paid off his mortgage so how will he manage on that?

How the other half live.

  • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    That math doesn’t work out. 67 year old man has a life expectation of 81, that’s 14 years of withdrawals of 50k per year assuming 0 interest. Since they’re getting interest, it would be more than 50k

    • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      And what’re they supposed to do if they live to 82? In retirement planning you want to overestimate how long you’ll live because the alternative really really sucks. In this case they’re assuming a 4% withdrawal rate which is considered “safe” in that there’s only a 5-10% chance you run out of money before 30 years.

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        There’s only like a 0.1% chance he makes it to 97. Who cares if there’s a 10% chance he’ll run out of money at 97 when there’s a 99.99% chance he’ll be dead. Can’t spend money if you’re dead.

        The 4% rule is useful rule of thumb if you’re like 50-60 when you retire. If you’re pushing 70, you can increase it.

          • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            ok so 97% chance of death. What I said remains correct, his late age of working means he can withdraw more than 4%. 4% is the rule of thumb for people retiring at 55, not at 67

            • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 days ago
              1. We don’t know the gender of this person

              2. Rule of 4% is just for a period of 30 years. The math doesn’t become less correct based on age. It was originally conceived in 1994 for people retiring 62-65. With increases in life expectancy since then I don’t think 67 is too far of a stretch to apply it.

                • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  In today’s news there is a 67 year old man who hates his job and wants to retire.

                  I was going off of this from OP, I thought they knew this person personally and didn’t see the hyperlink