Lusamommy@alien.top to Conservative@lemm.ee · 1 year agoMore than 3,000 auto dealers sign letter opposing Biden's electric vehicle mandatewww.foxbusiness.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down112
arrow-up1-10arrow-down1external-linkMore than 3,000 auto dealers sign letter opposing Biden's electric vehicle mandatewww.foxbusiness.comLusamommy@alien.top to Conservative@lemm.ee · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarespacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·1 year agoIt’s hard to gouge your customers in the name of “service” when the number of moving parts on the vehicle are drastically reduced. Hardly surprising that they’d rail against something that cuts into their profits.
minus-squareLusamommy@alien.topOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·1 year agoRunning out of foil for that hat?
minus-squarespacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·1 year agoIt’s not a conspiracy. More moving parts = more service = more money. Less moving parts = less service = less money. Care to be an ass about anything else?
minus-squareLusamommy@alien.topOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoSo? You’re still peddling utterly baseless conspiracies. The only ass here is you
minus-squarespacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoEverything I said is logical and an easy conclusion to come to if you know anything about vehicles. Come up with a counter argument instead of slinging insults. This is why nobody takes conservatives seriously. Grow a wrinkle and get back to me.
minus-squareLusamommy@alien.topOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoJust saying your conclusions are logical doesn’t make them so
minus-squarespacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoI’ve already shown you, broken down quite nicely for even the smoothest of brains to understand. I’m not sure why I’m engaging with you at all, however; you don’t engage in good faith regardless of what I write. I could splash you in the face with water and tell you you’re wet, and you’d still call me a liar. You seriously need to grow the fuck up.
minus-squareLookin4GoodArgs@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·1 year agoWarning: Rule 3, Bad Faith Comment You immediately jumped to accusing them of being conspiratorial without asking them to explain their reasoning.
minus-squareLusamommy@alien.topOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoHe made his argument perfectly clear. I don’t know why I’m not allowed to criticize it
minus-squarespacecowboy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYou criticized me, not my argument.
It’s hard to gouge your customers in the name of “service” when the number of moving parts on the vehicle are drastically reduced. Hardly surprising that they’d rail against something that cuts into their profits.
Running out of foil for that hat?
It’s not a conspiracy.
More moving parts = more service = more money. Less moving parts = less service = less money.
Care to be an ass about anything else?
So? You’re still peddling utterly baseless conspiracies. The only ass here is you
Everything I said is logical and an easy conclusion to come to if you know anything about vehicles.
Come up with a counter argument instead of slinging insults. This is why nobody takes conservatives seriously. Grow a wrinkle and get back to me.
Just saying your conclusions are logical doesn’t make them so
I’ve already shown you, broken down quite nicely for even the smoothest of brains to understand.
I’m not sure why I’m engaging with you at all, however; you don’t engage in good faith regardless of what I write.
I could splash you in the face with water and tell you you’re wet, and you’d still call me a liar.
You seriously need to grow the fuck up.
Warning: Rule 3, Bad Faith Comment
You immediately jumped to accusing them of being conspiratorial without asking them to explain their reasoning.
He made his argument perfectly clear. I don’t know why I’m not allowed to criticize it
You criticized me, not my argument.