Lydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agoIt's cannon.startrek.websiteimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down112
arrow-up1324arrow-down1imageIt's cannon.startrek.websiteLydia_K@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareHerbal Gamer@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 year agoThat explains the facial folds.
minus-squareSpendrill@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoAnd also why mother Klingons carry their young by gripping the loose skin on the back of their necks… no wait, I’m confusing Klingons with something else, aren’t I?
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNot canon, but there was a fan theory that the changes occurred after the tribbles were transported aboard the Klingon ship in TOS.
minus-squarehessianerd@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoThey retconned the TOS Klingons in Enterprise https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affliction_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)
That explains the facial folds.
And also why mother Klingons carry their young by gripping the loose skin on the back of their necks… no wait, I’m confusing Klingons with something else, aren’t I?
Not canon, but there was a fan theory that the changes occurred after the tribbles were transported aboard the Klingon ship in TOS.
They retconned the TOS Klingons in Enterprise
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affliction_(Star_Trek:_Enterprise)
TIL
Thanks