Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agoTrump administration drops defense of ban on employee 'noncompete' agreementswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down11cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up128arrow-down1external-linkTrump administration drops defense of ban on employee 'noncompete' agreementswww.reuters.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square2linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squaredavidgro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoThis is so hard to read, but I think the end result is of course the anti-worker one.
minus-squaremarkstos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoSeriously, there are four negatives in the headline. Competition would be good. Non-compete would be bad. Banning non-competes would be good. Defending a ban of non-competes would be good. So dropping a defense a ban on noncompetes would be bad.
This is so hard to read, but I think the end result is of course the anti-worker one.
Seriously, there are four negatives in the headline.
Competition would be good.
Non-compete would be bad.
Banning non-competes would be good.
Defending a ban of non-competes would be good.
So dropping a defense a ban on noncompetes would be bad.