• ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Which means they are capable of carrying explosives and that couldn’t have been known if they were or weren’t before being shot down. It’s possible I don’t know the technical definition of “decoy” but that sure doesn’t fit the description to me from a layman’s understanding.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Decoy means they are designed to waste Ukrainian anti air rockets and munitions by having them believe they are explosive drones. It’s literally what a decoy drone is. That is why they are shaped similar to the Shahed so people cannot tell the difference from afar.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Perhaps I’m conflating “decoy” and “dummy”. But if one of the drones had real, actual explosives in it I don’t see how it’s a waste of resources to defend yourself from them.

        Or am I misunderstanding what you mean when you say there were explosives found. Is the point that these drones, even if carrying explosives, we’re not actually capable of detonation?

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I read rumors one single drone allegedly held a small amount of explosives (like 4pounds/2kg). I’m not sure if this was actually confirmed.

          Actual Shaheds can carry 100pounds/50kg of explosives.

          These Gerbera drones are not a more cost effective way of delivering explosives beacuse they also require a motor and other hardware. They are meant to deplete air defenses.