How could a robust decentralised file system be useful?

Would you use one if one was available?

If so, to what use (storing, sharing, building apps on top of it, …)?

If not, are there some specific reasons like difficulty to set up, legal, you already use one, or other?

I’m making one and it is fully functional but adoption is not here yet so I’m trying to figure out why.

Cheers

Edit: I’m referring to a decentralised online storage, accessible from anywhere.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    For personal use, no. There is no benefit.

    For something like a home cluster, yes I would use something like Ceph to spread the data over several systems.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, I don’t really have a use case for a remote file system my self currently, decentralized or otherwise. It’s an interesting idea though. I’m curious how that would even work.

    I could imagine it being useful for some organization that has membership that fluctuates consistently. Precluding relying on anyone to manage or host a central file server. Or an organization that can’t rely on a central server staying up due to some adversarial relationship with another party.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or something on a mesh network that pulls the movie you want into RAM from the nearest network node that has it.

      It’s not like it’s sloppier than how android works.

    • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you want more info just ask away, but in a nutshell my system is based on reciprocal sharing (I share yours because you share mine), so as soon as there are a bunch of users, there will never be a shortage of storage space. Most other systems are based on benevolent users who donate space, but I feel it might not scale well.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is it a matter of everyone having a copy of every file? Or is there some sort of limit, like, a certain amount of people connected having a copy being deemed enough to ensure that it will always be available?

        • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You decide, so if you want a redundance of 10 for example, you’d share ten (similar sized) files and ten others will share your file.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I ran a couple decentralized filesystems 20+ years ago on FreeBSD. It was cool but I didn’t find it was worth the headaches for my use cases as compared to spinning up a raid array and nfs exporting it.

  • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve used ceph (very little) and longhorn for Kubernetes storage. I’ve never really looked into distributed filesystems but could see something with a longhorn or lower level of administrative complexity as something I would use. The replication and fault tolerance would be my primary interest. Some sort of network share on top of the distributed filesystem too, like windows DFS sort of?

    Also, again, never looked into distributed filesystems much but if there was a mode where a distributed filesystem could replace syncthing for ensuring a copy of the data was replicated to specific/all machines, that would be interesting. Specifically I’d like to replicate my media share to my laptop so I have it when offline / traveling. I’m all on Linux these days but something like what windows has where you can make a network share available offline and it just caches it to a local directory…. Feels like a distributed FS could do something similar.

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think eventually many will be forced to organize, do business and socialize without using servers. It will involve decentralized file sharing.

    So far there has not been a good reason fur many to use that strategy because there is no popular ecosystem and most use the far easier server modal.

    But eventually, perhaps soon, there will be obstacles to hosting some types of sites and apps. Some legal, and some business reasons.

    Then what you are doing will be more in need, so it’s good you are doing it

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    sure but like not for everything. I use online for moving files mostly and photos actually because if I lost all my photos it would be sad but not like catastrophic and they take a lot of space compared to docs.

    • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Would you use one online filesystem for that if the counterpart was to share some disk space (and bandwidth)?

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        oh yeah I could totally see it. I think the big issue is I don’t keep my machine on and likely other people don’t to which would be a problem to the whole system.

        • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I figured that too, so my system overshares, you have 10 others sharing your data (or more or less, but you’d chip in more or less shared storage too) so that statistically the information is accessible close to all the time.

            • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes it’s not for storing large backups, more hundreds of gigas maybe, or stuff like git repos or a website

              Thanks for the input!

    • Valmond@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I do!

      Peergos is an open-source project

      So it’s Dropbox with FOSS and encryption if I understands it correctly, very neat!

      The only drawback is it’s centralised, but I will for sure check this out.

  • higgsboson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Depending on how we are defining it, I have used several in my personal and professional lives. I dont see a compelling use case for me currently in my self-hosting setup.