• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 hours ago

    People buy SUVs because “safer” but they kill more pedestrians - and they’re not strictly safer for occupants either. Big SUVs have rollover risk. Crossovers aren’t necessarily any safer in a collision because it turns out that what really matters is the “area” of the car (length x width) and since crossovers and SUVs often cost more, you end up getting a smaller vehicle by area for the same amount of money. You literally get less for your money and it’s also less fun to drive and probably requires more fuel. I honestly don’t see why people without back issues get crossovers over wagons.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I am mostly in agreement with you but why would the area of the car matter? You can potentially have bigger crumple zones, but that’d exclude the space that is used for passengers. Other than that, the energy transferred in a collision is relative to the mass, where the lighter vehicle receives a larger proportion of the energy than the heavier one.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Crumple zones are one thing, but also there might be more distance between you and the door in a bigger vehicle, etc. So somehow that’s how it scales