Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, if I own a condo in a high rise building, how does this work? Does the building get the tax, and that gets divided up among all the condos? Or does each living space get it’s own tax?

      • c10l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except in cuckoo-land (UK) where most apartment owners don’t own any part of the land where their property is built. It’s called a leasehold and is batshit insane.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So rental that gives the same development right as owning the place but without it being for an indefinite length of time? So you need to have a return on investment before the lease expires otherwise why not just go for a normal rent? 🤔