• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You cannot in good faith compare people who have suffered because if their skin color to those who have not, when talking about situations where skin color comes up.

    Are both situations racist by pure definition? Sure. Just like punching a man and punching a child are both punching. One is much more wrong.

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck all that noise…

      One racially motivated act (say hitting someone because of their skin color) is not any more or less racist depending on the race of the victim. If you believe that, it is by definition a racist value you’re holding.

      There’s a difference when it comes to contextual, social and historical factors. Like the word cracker is insensitive but doesn’t carry the hateful connotations and discrimination that the N-word possesses.

      But anyone trying to say it’s more or less appropriate to hate on any single group is just demonstrating their own implicit and explicit racial biases.

    • Pokethat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a brown person. It doesn’t matter what color you are. Someone’s race shouldn’t matter at all when comparing how fucked up something is unless it’s directly culturally relevant.

      A white guy vs black woman RNA paper writing PhD being told gtfo is equally offensive. Race only matter like if you told the white guy vs black woman something like a joke about picking cotton or the white guy a joke about him fucking his sister.

      Telling someone “you don’t matter / you are the enemy” for over a decade and to millions of people is how an actual white nationalist movement became a thing. You can only tell people how horrible and evil they are until they start to believe in it.