Fuck off. Its great you found a sample ballot from southern illinois but it does not look anything like mine. I actually vote every primary as its the best time to effect the election.
What do they list for all the candidates that don’t have a VP because no party in the US nominates a VP through a primary. Hell, Biden didn’t select Harris until after the 2016 primary was completed, so who was on the ballot with him then?
You are completely full of shit and it makes me wonder why you are so OK with lying about this.
this is not lying. even you where aware harris was his vp since the last election which by the way was 2020 (oh my should I call you a liar for saying 2016) which make you the liar or extrememly disengenous as you definately knew who the vp was for the democratic party when and if you voted in the 2024 democratic party primary.
no. no. we have not. I am pointing out your disengenous nature which actually shows up rather much in this last response. Your making a narrative about how kamala was somehow not part of the ticket when its known that it was. As far as the ballot seeing both names was on my ballot and is common.
So you are just going to keep lying about the primary? Well, I guess that is where we are then. A disagreement about facts that were easily verified. Don’t expect to convince very many people if basic honesty doesn’t fit into your argument.
You lied. I proved you lied. You chose to keep lying anyways. I guess there isn’t anything else to discuss.
Im fine where its stands as far as Im concerned. Folks can see the difference between someone trying to win on some sort of technicality they have in their head than the actual situation . Again im not sure you have ever voted if seeing the two names is something you have never seen. EDITED - UnspecificGravity blocked me after the his reply following this but it is a good example of narrative argument vs genuine argument.
Its not a technicality that the DNC ran a presidential candidate that was not selected by a primary and lost to the worst president in history for the second time. If they choose to learn nothing from that, as you seem inclined to do, then it is a situation that will repeat itself time and again.
But yeah, keep lying about what a primary is, that’ll make a difference.
Fuck off. Its great you found a sample ballot from southern illinois but it does not look anything like mine. I actually vote every primary as its the best time to effect the election.
What do they list for all the candidates that don’t have a VP because no party in the US nominates a VP through a primary. Hell, Biden didn’t select Harris until after the 2016 primary was completed, so who was on the ballot with him then?
You are completely full of shit and it makes me wonder why you are so OK with lying about this.
this is not lying. even you where aware harris was his vp since the last election which by the way was 2020 (oh my should I call you a liar for saying 2016) which make you the liar or extrememly disengenous as you definately knew who the vp was for the democratic party when and if you voted in the 2024 democratic party primary.
So we have gone from:
Kalama totally was on the ballot and won the primary, I know because I saw it on the ballot
to
Well, I mean, we all knew she was Biden’s VP, so that means she was nominated to be the presidential candidate for … reasons.
Want to move the goalposts any more before I respond?
no. no. we have not. I am pointing out your disengenous nature which actually shows up rather much in this last response. Your making a narrative about how kamala was somehow not part of the ticket when its known that it was. As far as the ballot seeing both names was on my ballot and is common.
So you are just going to keep lying about the primary? Well, I guess that is where we are then. A disagreement about facts that were easily verified. Don’t expect to convince very many people if basic honesty doesn’t fit into your argument.
You lied. I proved you lied. You chose to keep lying anyways. I guess there isn’t anything else to discuss.
Im fine where its stands as far as Im concerned. Folks can see the difference between someone trying to win on some sort of technicality they have in their head than the actual situation . Again im not sure you have ever voted if seeing the two names is something you have never seen. EDITED - UnspecificGravity blocked me after the his reply following this but it is a good example of narrative argument vs genuine argument.
Its not a technicality that the DNC ran a presidential candidate that was not selected by a primary and lost to the worst president in history for the second time. If they choose to learn nothing from that, as you seem inclined to do, then it is a situation that will repeat itself time and again.
But yeah, keep lying about what a primary is, that’ll make a difference.