Police in the town of Savage, Minnesota, are now investigating an attack on a little girl at a local school by assailants, schoolchildren, who told officials they beat her up because "she wasn't Muslim."
What game? I’m trying to game a serious discussion and help you make am ironclad argument so I can respond to it appropriately.
Response to your comment below because your inability to understand the basics of debating combined with your need to constantly belittle anyone with a different opinion seems to have caused us to hit the thread limit:
Hahaha for a guy who likes to take digs on the reading comprehension of others yours isn’t any better.
You’ve got maybe half of it, that I’m asking for A because B but I’ve already explained why B is B. If you can’t understand than I guess you’re the one who’s gotta go back to 5th grade.
I’ll distill your circular logic. Hopefully it’s simple enough for you to grasp.
You have to provide A (good white supremists) because of B (comparison between white supremists violence and Muslim violence is invalid) but I won’t provide evidence of B until you provide A.
This is the game your playing because you don’t have evidence of B.
Sorry, it’s not on the other party to prove your point for you. It’s on you.
Can’t defend your point or accusations you’ve made.
Says the guy who still hasn’t defended his yet.
I’m ready to go with mine as soon as you defend yours.
You’re not, your playing this little game because you know you can’t defend your position.
What game? I’m trying to game a serious discussion and help you make am ironclad argument so I can respond to it appropriately.
Response to your comment below because your inability to understand the basics of debating combined with your need to constantly belittle anyone with a different opinion seems to have caused us to hit the thread limit:
Hahaha for a guy who likes to take digs on the reading comprehension of others yours isn’t any better.
You’ve got maybe half of it, that I’m asking for A because B but I’ve already explained why B is B. If you can’t understand than I guess you’re the one who’s gotta go back to 5th grade.
I’ll distill your circular logic. Hopefully it’s simple enough for you to grasp.
You have to provide A (good white supremists) because of B (comparison between white supremists violence and Muslim violence is invalid) but I won’t provide evidence of B until you provide A.
This is the game your playing because you don’t have evidence of B.