I have an 11th gen Framework mainboard which I would like to repurpose as a server. Unfortunately, (unless I do some super janky stuff) I can only connect 1 drive to it over M.2 and any additional ones must be over USB.

I am thinking of just using some portable hard drives and plugging them in over USB. I plan to RAID1 them and use them as boot drives and data storage, and use the M.2 slot for something unrelated.

In your experiences, is USB reliable enough nowadays to run a RAID array for a server like this? If it is, does it depend on the specific drive used?

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Well, nothing is reliable over USB type A. If you don’t want to DIY you can get a USB JBOD with type-c like this one or that one or this cheaper one. They’ll get the job done for a price. :)

    However, there are easy ways to get reliable SATA ports from m2 slots that your framework has. NVME to 6 SATA ports: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004263885851.html

    To power the disks you can use ANY standard ATX power supply (get something brand-gold second hand for 20$). To make sure the PSU stays ON, just plug a wire between the green and any black wire.

    Another option for power is to get a cheap 12V power supply and a step down DC/DC to provide 5V. If you don’t have it a SATA cable like this is helpful. Simply cut the white plug and attach the red cable (5v) to the output of the DC/DC and the yellow one (12V) directly to the power supply.

    There’s also these dual output power supplies that you can regulate to 12v+5v but frankly I would just go for the option above as it will be safer.

    Make sure you check every voltage and polarity before plugging anything into your power supply!!

  • 0000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do not recommend it. I ran two USB hard drives for over a year in BTRFS RAID1, and I had millions of errors repaired every month when I scrubbed it.

  • Shimitar@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Been running raid1 on USB for over a decade. Avoid chaeap USB stuff, get foot brand USB boxes and preferably a JBOD multi-disk enclosure, since they tend to be the best quality.

    Never had a disconnect.

    Beware to properly label your driver tough, as Linux software raid (I use that) tend to hiccup on boot if the kernel reassign USB devices after a reboot.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    In my experience, noooooo.

    I’ve had too many momentary disconnects with USB devices to trust that on a 24/7 server.

    An early server I built had a large USB backup drive for a RAID5 array and every month there was usually something that went wrong.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve been doing USB with raid on several servers for 10 years. No random disconnects.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Because I have a total of 28 drives and it works really well and is flexible.

          12 of them are in a Synology though

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sata extension cards aren’t expensive you should know.

    • Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Agreed. You’re at the mercy of your USB controllers as well as southbridge in that case.

      You’re adding more things that can go wrong.

      Generally HBA/RAID cards are usually built for enterprise rather than consumer so they’re usually more reliable as well.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Today’s CPUs usually expose some USB connections directly. Ryzen 7000 desktop CPUs expose 4 USB 3.2 Gen 2 directly on their on-package I/O die for example. So if you connect your USB drives directly to the ports your mainboard connects directly to the CPU, the chipset (“southbridge”) and any third-party USB controllers are out of the equation.

        This is just information, I’m not advising to use USB for fixed storage.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I plan to RAID1 them and use them as boot drives

    This will not work unless the mainboard is handling the RAID control in firmware. If you are doing software RAID then the OS must boot before the array can be accessed.

    If you just want to set up a NAS, you can get a used PowerEdge tower for very little money, and it will work a lot better than what you have planned.

    • anon2963@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      In the past I have used Proxmox with ZFS raid on a basic mini PC. With ZFS raid it syncs everything except /boot. Proxmox has a tool called “proxmox-boot-tool-refresh” which will syncs /boot between drives. ZFS kernel module can be loaded in the initramfs so it will boot fine, even if missing a drive.

      For this project I do not plan to use ZFS, but AFAIK software raid is now standard. Here is a popular video from Level1Techs talking about the flaws of hardware RAID: https://youtu.be/l55GfAwa8RI

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    PSU Power Supply Unit
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
    ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

    [Thread #760 for this sub, first seen 25th May 2024, 08:25] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The big factor is the chip make in the USB enclosure/adapter. Realtek is most reliable, followed by Asmedia. JMicron is garbage (will get hot and drop connection).

    What’s your goal by using RAID1? Do you really need redundancy — keep the system alive if the main drive good down?

    If you only need backup then you don’t need RAID, and that should fare much better — just take an incremental snapshot to the USB drive periodically and let it sleep the rest of the time.

  • infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    There should be an m.2 port for the wifi chip,you can buy sata expansion cards there, sthg like this:

    Search for “m.2 key e sata”. Use wired net on a usb dongle, if it doesn’t have an ethernet port

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    USB-storage isn’t reliable.

    Period.

    ANY fscking thing that bumps any connection, can break the dam link.

    Then your kernel can re-label the device when it re-connects,

    and you’ve got to reassemble your RAID.

    just my experience.

    use ANY other method you can, other than USB.

    stick a SATA adaptor on there somewhere, if you can.

    Get a different motherboard.

    ANYthing, but not USB.

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Always use /dev/disk/* (I use by-id) for RAID, as those links will stay constant even if a disk is renamed (for example, from sdb to sdd).

  • dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You are quite likely to regret going down this route. Should do what you have to to get the drives properly connected.

  • Ferawyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    No. USB is not designed to be reliable. It’s designed to be plug and play. Don’t plug and play with your data.