• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is a massive difference between a business being cashless and a government enforced “cashless society” like this post describes.

    • freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Spain, Belgium, and France have banned cash transactions above a threshhold (e.g. €3k) at least 5 years ago already. Cannot pay tax using cash in Belgium. Think about that for a minute.

      New recent law in Belgium: all businesses (incl. self-employed workers and even landlords renting out property) MUST accept electronic payment. Try doing that without using a bank.

    • Cognitive_Dissident@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      sigh If a simple majority of businesses decided to go 100% cashless, the government would have no choice but to embrace it. Again: too many of you sit there in your chairs and say “oh well that could NEVER happen” then when it does you’re shocked, shocked I tell you, that it DID happen.

      I get pretty fucking tired of explaining things over and over again to people who apparently are just plain too dense to grasp what I’m saying and be rational about it.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago
        1. I completely disagree that if a majority of businesses went cashless that would mean the government has no choice but to be cashless.
        2. I never said it “could NEVER happen.”
        3. What do you mean it “DID happen,” it hasn’t.
        4. Ad hominem gets you nowhere.