• sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    They are drawing that distinction for a reason. They literally said everyone is everything on the internet. I don’t how else you could possibly read that.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I read “everyone is everything on the internet” meaning you can always find someone who is anything, because the internet is just so big and diverse. Not as calling you a liar. Maybe I’m wrong, don’t want to put words in their mouth. But that’s how I read it.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe you’re right, that sounds possible. I would think if that’s their intention they wouldn’t have written that “everyone” is everything, and would instead say “someone” or something to that effect. At that point I’m probably just overanalyzing though.

        • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          That was more a comment on obfuscation of the net. In internet you can just trow adjectives together and somebody will raise their hand, but you can never be sure if they are just putting on a role.

          • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That makes more sense to me. Although, I would contend that people in real life can also just put on a role to varying degrees of success depending on the exact circumstances. Presumably when you said “personally” though, you meant people you already knew well enough to verify their claims to some extent.