You know, I had other things I wanted to yell about. I have about five essays in my drafts folder about like, deep systemic issues and big bad shadows on the horizon. And I have like three jobs, all of which are screaming for my attention. But I cannot

I recently listened to a “tech” podcast host drone on for 45 minutes about the “Elon vs Zuck” cage match and this piece perfectly captures the frothing, screaming stream-of-conciousness in my brain at the thought of seeing another discussion about Twitter vs Threads/Insta/Face/burning-sh*itpile. I felt some small amount of catharsis just from reading.

  • Feanor@beehaw.org
    83·
    1 year ago

    “a half-baked Mastodon instance Frankenstein-stitched to the rib of Instagram” Nothing to add just a brilliant quote

  • trashhalo@beehaw.org
    38·
    1 year ago

    Key moments pulled from kagi.com

    • The author is upset and suspicious of Mark Zuckerberg and his new social media platform Threads.

    • The author believes Zuckerberg is not to be trusted given Facebook’s history of data harvesting, privacy violations, and spreading misinformation.

    • Facebook bears responsibility for spreading conspiracy theories and radicalizing people.

    • The author thinks the positive reception of Threads is likely due to astroturfing and artificial boosting by Zuckerberg.

    • Zuckerberg has a long history of unethical behavior and putting profits over people.

    • The author worries that Threads will be used to manipulate the 2024 election and spread misinformation.

    • The author thinks people are too easily falling for Zuckerberg’s rebranding as a “cool uncle” figure with Threads.

    • The author argues that Zuckerberg has not changed and Threads will eventually become just like Facebook.

    • The author warns against trusting Zuckerberg and Threads, comparing it to a panther that seems cool at first but will eventually harm people.

    • The author believes Zuckerberg’s ultimate goal is to control what information people see online.

    • distractedcactus@beehaw.orgOP
      19·
      1 year ago

      That is completely accurate and logical representation of the article after it’s had the heart ripped out KALIMAAA-style and been lowered into a pit.

    • DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one
      3·
      1 year ago

      I was about to ask if Kagi is worth paying for, but their website does a tremendous job of selling it. I am going to have to give up a subscription to afford it, but I think it will be worth it. Actually… maybe not. I pay for everything annually when I can. Too bad they don’t have that option, but it makes sense when their are hard limits to searches and features between tiers.

      • trashhalo@beehaw.org
        2·
        1 year ago

        Dude kagi is the best. Google search is gotten so fucking bad. It’s nice to use a search where you aren’t the product to sell ads to. Also the summarizer they added is really helpful if I’m on the fence about reading something.

  • audaxdreik@pawb.socialEnglish
    22·
    1 year ago

    Love Catherynne M. Valente, amazing author. Check out her work if you haven’t already; I’m partial to her collection of short stories, The Melancholy of Mechagirl

  • echo@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    14·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad I’m apparently not online enough to have any idea what she’s pissed off about

    • Grimpen@lemmy.caEnglish
      19·
      1 year ago

      Twitter had an outage at the same time Threads: An Instagram App was launching. Threads now has something like 100 million accounts in a matter of days.

      So apparently lots of people and businesses are replacing Twitter with Threads. It’s just over here on Lemmy, most of us seem to be Reddit refugees. There is a lot of discussion about Threads federation via ActivityPub (if you are on the right communities at least), but otherwise I think we are all mostly just happy to leave all that corporate BS behind.

      • echo@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        7·
        1 year ago

        yeah, I know about Threads, I just haven’t seen any of this zuck fanboying that she’s talking about

        • snowbell@beehaw.orgEnglish
          19·
          1 year ago

          I’ve seen a lot of people suggest that Zuck is a more ethical person, which I think is an absolutely ridiculous claim.

          • PostmodernPythia@beehaw.orgEnglish
            22·
            1 year ago

            Yep. The difference is emotional, not material. Zuck, like most billionaires, seems happy to sleep on his pile of Scrooge McDuck money and fuck people over. Muskrat does all that, but he asks something more of us than our money and our lives. He wants, maybe even needs, us to love and respect him while he does it. And that sets rage-fires in the brain-parts.

            • jherazob@beehaw.orgEnglish
              2·
              1 year ago

              He’s the Milhouse of billionaires, constitutionally, utterly unable to be anything remotely close to cool, yet obsessively craves to be perceived as such. And any and all of his attempts put him farther away to this goal.