tracyspcy@lemmy.ml to ChatGPT@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoOver just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study findsfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down11cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOver just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study findsfortune.comtracyspcy@lemmy.ml to ChatGPT@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoNo that is not the thesis of this story. If I’m reading the headline correctly, the rate of its being correct has changed from one stable distribution to another one.
No that is not the thesis of this story. If I’m reading the headline correctly, the rate of its being correct has changed from one stable distribution to another one.