Should we consider Ranked Choice voting for SC elections?
discuss.python.org
Speaking for myself: Summary I propose changing our Steering Council election process from simple approval voting to a ranked choice system to better capture voter preferences and provide more meaningful feedback to candidates. I want your input to know if this is worth pursuing. Background Our PEP-13 voting method has remained unchanged since late 2019. While functional, the simple approval voting system has limitations we should address. Current Limitations No Preference Expression: Voter...

Original comment:

I don’t know much about voting systems, but I know someone who does. Unfortunately he’s currently banned. Maybe we can wait until his 3-month ban expires and ask him for advice?

Previous discussion

  • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    191·
    3 months ago

    valid criticism of his own defense

    To be clear that post makes a valid point (don’t defend people just because they seem nice or dedicated or whatever), but it isn’t a valid criticism of Chris’s post because he didn’t do that.

    He did say Tim is nice and dedicated etc. etc. but he also went through the specific crimes that Tim was supposed to have committed and refuted them.

    I read a load of Tim’s comments and this was definitely a case of the CoC people getting annoyed with someone who disagreed with them and wouldn’t give up. There wasn’t anything remotely ban-worthy.

    • Thann@lemmy.mlEnglish
      81·
      3 months ago

      "Dismissing unacceptable behavior of others as a ‘neurodivergent’ trait, which is problematic because it creates a stereotype that neurodivergent people are hard to interact with and need special treatment.

      I’ll show you how difficult it is to work with neurodivergent people!

      /* SLAMS BAN HAMMER /*

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      3 months ago

      this was definitely a case of the CoC people getting annoyed with someone who disagreed with them and wouldn’t give up

      People suck. If someone is disagreeing with you and won’t give up, it’s time to reevaluate why you’re defending your position so vehemently.

      • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
        6·
        3 months ago

        From what I could tell it’s just because he cared about things a lot, and maybe is a little on the spectrum. He definitely wasn’t wrong, and maybe other people would have just given up and gone on with their lives but I don’t think that’s necessarily a trait to encourage.

        To put it another way, sometimes when people kick up a fuss it’s because they are obstinate naysayers, and sometimes it’s because they’re doggedly holding decision makers to account. This seemed more like the latter from what I read.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          5·
          3 months ago

          Exactly, which is why as a decision-maker, if you’re getting a lot of pushback, it’s important to take a step back and rethink your decision. It could be that you’re absolutely right, or it could be that you’re being obstinate just because you don’t like having your authority challenged.

          That’s basically my day job. I make decisions all the time, and when I get pushback, I take a step back and try to look at the decision with fresh eyes. I would expect anyone in a position like this to do the same.