• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why was it a bad idea? Seems like a wonderful idea. Minus Gab.

    Some kind of web of trust and inheriting ignored users based on it and weights - and it will work.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sounds to me like an extension that by design tracks every Web page you visit.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not necessarily and only those you comment.

        That’s the point, to comment any webpage. It’s clear you visited it if you comment it.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Presumably it loads comments when you visit a page. That would send a request with the URL to whatever service they’re running.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Unless you make a p2p system and search comments by page hash in some way (maybe just over I2P?) making it hard for other nodes to understand from which node it comes and which node downloads those comments.

            OK, I agree. Not very good. But in theory it can be better.