• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I appreciate that information. However, flounders themselves are not bilaterally symmetrical. I have caught many dozens of them and it’s pretty easy to tell that they are not.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh, I know. It’s very interesting. But when people imagine a flounder, they generally don’t imagine a juvenile unless juvenile has been specified.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Isn’t it referring to during development? Like as they’re forming, they are bilateral? I haven’t taken developmental biology in many years, so I’m maybe wrong.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          They’re only bilateral when they’re very young. And even then, everyone is just focusing on the eyes. The body of the fish is also not exactly bilateral. Just fillet a flounder of any age (or watch a video on it) and you’ll see.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          They are born (or hatch too lazy to look up) and their eyes move later once they get larger.

          • BreadOven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah. I just wasn’t sure at what point things are considered to be bilateral or otherwise.

            I thought it may have been during the development process, but can’t remember.