You can use https://lemmyverse.net/ to check actual subscriber numbers.

Edit: Why YSK: New users of Lemmy can find the number low and think that a community is dead or inactive, when infact it might be a thriving place with a lot of activity.

  • jose1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a huge thing I didn’t know about. Lemmy really needs to show the full number. I’m on .world and even here everything seems really niche and small. It hurts perception hugely

    • qwop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, there currently seem to be a bunch of rough edges with Lemmy. Another is that iirc editing a comment increases the comment count shown on a post.

      Nothing that can’t be fixed though, and it’s encouraging how good Lemmy feels already compared to reddit (for me at least).

        • qwop@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha, got a “network error” on my first attempt so clicked send again, I guess it did go through the first time after all :D

          • lazyvar@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Typical Lemmy experience, haha.

            Honestly has its charms, gives me the feeling of nostalgia, like we’re back in the early 2000’s.

    • derelict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At a bare minimum it should be called ‘local subscribers’ to make that clear if there are technical reasons making a total number difficult

  • Zikeji@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t looked into Lemmy/fediverse philosophy so I don’t know how viable it is, but I’d love to see some variant of “X subscribers total on known servers (y from local)” in the future.

    Well, I don’t really pay attention to and I’m sure they’ll make browser extensions at some point. So not even remotely close to a priority.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be happy to see it divided by total users in an instance; 21.7% of the users on bands.music are subscribed to Beatles, 1.3% are subscribed to Soundgarden, so on.

  • boots@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    New to Lemmy. I also found the stats confusing. I expected to see global community stats and for them to be synced between instances.

    The current situation makes people think that Lemmy is basically empty 😅

  • Frogge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For all the problems with Reddit, I can see there being so many barriers to entry on here that will keep a lot of people from ever using or switching to Lemmy. Hope this gets ironed out.

    • fishos@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually think some technological hurdle is a good thing. If it’s a little difficult to join, that will act as its own filter to keep the laziest and lowest effort people away.

  • Altair@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This needs to be integrated into Lemmy asap; really hurts discoverability and makes comms look way smaller than they are to new users.

    This, instance migration, and assigning new users to good general instances (that arent overloaded) like lemm.ee or vlemmy.net upon registration (letting them change it of course) so they don’t need to know about instances would go a long way to being user friendly.